116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20095286)
1. Opposing free healthcare.
Allan R
Clin Med (Lond); 2009 Dec; 9(6):511. PubMed ID: 20095286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Federal insurance reform. The ripples that will reach your desk.
Findlay S
Bus Health; 1996 Oct; 14(10):30-2, 35. PubMed ID: 10161487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Clinton prescription for an ailing health system.
Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1993 Sep; 47(38):1-10. PubMed ID: 10128873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act: encouraging health care reform.
Grayson M
Spectrum; 1997; 70(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 10177019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. ERISA preemption of chapter 58: the future of the "pay or play" model of health care legislation.
Stiefel J
Am J Law Med; 2007; 33(4):683-701. PubMed ID: 18277514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The side effects of health reform.
Findlay S
Bus Health; 1993 Dec; 11(14):51-3. PubMed ID: 10130518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Surviving preemption: the importance of Chapter 58 in the context of America's health care crisis.
Ten Haagent A
Am J Law Med; 2007; 33(4):663-82. PubMed ID: 18277513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. It's time to reform health care reform.
Start CA
J Mich Dent Assoc; 2010 Oct; 92(10):34, 36. PubMed ID: 21133286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clash of the Titans: State All-Payer Claims Reporting Systems Meet ERISA Preemption.
Rosenbaum S
Milbank Q; 2015 Dec; 93(4):683-6. PubMed ID: 26626981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Disassociate from this plan. Pre-empting state regulation of insurance pools would hurt consumers.
Kofman M; Polzer K
Mod Healthc; 2004 Feb; 34(5):21. PubMed ID: 14974302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinton's health care reform proposal: promising but structurally flawed.
Solomon JE; Weissburg C
Healthspan; 1993 Nov; 10(10):3-7. PubMed ID: 10130838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. What they're saying about the Clinton health reform plan. Panel discussion.
Brown L; Burns JM; Casey PJ; Caulfield SC; Formica PE; Halvorson G; Lehnhard MN; Lynne D; Michaud JR; Miller S
Bus Health; 1993 Nov; 11(13):28-9, 32-6, 40. PubMed ID: 10130505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. States balk at premium hikes; health plans may face a squeeze.
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2010 May; 19(5):5-6, 9. PubMed ID: 20524360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A win-win approach to financing health care reform.
Gruber J
N Engl J Med; 2009 Jul; 361(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 19516024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Supreme Court upholds health care reform: what's next for employer-sponsored group health plans?
Sciscoe TS; Schaefer SA; Mumford TA
Health Care Law Mon; 2012 Sep; 2012(9):2-10. PubMed ID: 23045902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of reform on small businesses.
Polk JJ
J Health Care Benefits; 1994; 3(3):50-2. PubMed ID: 10131219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. AMA delegates defeat resolution opposing Clinton healthcare plan.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1994 Jun; 24(25):6. PubMed ID: 10134482
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Modern health care for all Americans.
Obama B
N Engl J Med; 2008 Oct; 359(15):1537-41. PubMed ID: 18815388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Clinton reducing plan.
Goodgame D
Time; 1994 May; 143(22):42-3. PubMed ID: 10134122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An overview of selected employer requirements in the wake of health reform.
Mick S
Health Care Law Mon; 2010 Dec; 2010(12):2-6. PubMed ID: 21323029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
