BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20096462)

  • 1. Short-term visual outcomes of Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation.
    Dunlap K; Chak G; Aquavella JV; Myrowitz E; Utine CA; Akpek E
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):687-92. PubMed ID: 20096462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longer-term vision outcomes and complications with the Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis at the University of California, Davis.
    Greiner MA; Li JY; Mannis MJ
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Aug; 118(8):1543-50. PubMed ID: 21397948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis: the university of california davis experience.
    Bradley JC; Hernandez EG; Schwab IR; Mannis MJ
    Cornea; 2009 Apr; 28(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 19387235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual and clinical outcomes of explantation versus preservation of the intraocular lens during keratoprosthesis implantation.
    Utine CA; Tzu J; Dunlap K; Akpek EK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1615-22. PubMed ID: 21855761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Boston type I keratoprosthesis: improving outcomes and expanding indications.
    Aldave AJ; Kamal KM; Vo RC; Yu F
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Apr; 116(4):640-51. PubMed ID: 19243830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Refractive and corneal aberrometric changes after intracorneal ring implantation in corneas with pellucid marginal degeneration.
    Piñero DP; Alio JL; Morbelli H; Uceda-Montanes A; El Kady B; Coskunseven E; Pascual I
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Sep; 116(9):1656-64. PubMed ID: 19643482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Boston keratoprosthesis in the management of corneal limbal stem cell deficiency.
    Sejpal K; Yu F; Aldave AJ
    Cornea; 2011 Nov; 30(11):1187-94. PubMed ID: 21885964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intracorneal ring segment implantation in corneas with post-laser in situ keratomileusis keratectasia.
    Piñero DP; Alio JL; Uceda-Montanes A; El Kady B; Pascual I
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Sep; 116(9):1665-74. PubMed ID: 19643485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. International results with the Boston type I keratoprosthesis.
    Aldave AJ; Sangwan VS; Basu S; Basak SK; Hovakimyan A; Gevorgyan O; Kharashi SA; Jindan MA; Tandon R; Mascarenhas J; Malyugin B; Padilla MD; Maskati Q; Agarwala N; Hutauruk J; Sharma M; Yu F
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Aug; 119(8):1530-8. PubMed ID: 22512986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Boston keratoprosthesis type II: the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary experience.
    Pujari S; Siddique SS; Dohlman CH; Chodosh J
    Cornea; 2011 Dec; 30(12):1298-303. PubMed ID: 21963861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term complications associated with glaucoma drainage devices and Boston keratoprosthesis.
    Li JY; Greiner MA; Brandt JD; Lim MC; Mannis MJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Aug; 152(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 21636070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Boston keratoprosthesis in Stevens-Johnson syndrome.
    Sayegh RR; Ang LP; Foster CS; Dohlman CH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 145(3):438-44. PubMed ID: 18207122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term follow-up of Intacs for post-LASIK corneal ectasia.
    Kymionis GD; Tsiklis NS; Pallikaris AI; Kounis G; Diakonis VF; Astyrakakis N; Siganos CS
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1909-17. PubMed ID: 17074560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Results from the multicenter Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study.
    Zerbe BL; Belin MW; Ciolino JB;
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1779.e1-7. PubMed ID: 16872678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis implantation as the primary penetrating corneal procedure.
    Kang JJ; de la Cruz J; Cortina MS
    Cornea; 2012 Dec; 31(12):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22367042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Refractive and aberrometric outcomes of intracorneal ring segments for keratoconus: mechanical versus femtosecond-assisted procedures.
    Piñero DP; Alio JL; El Kady B; Coskunseven E; Morbelli H; Uceda-Montanes A; Maldonado MJ; Cuevas D; Pascual I
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Sep; 116(9):1675-87. PubMed ID: 19643498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis in aniridia: a retrospective multicenter study.
    Akpek EK; Harissi-Dagher M; Petrarca R; Butrus SI; Pineda R; Aquavella JV; Dohlman CH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Aug; 144(2):227-231. PubMed ID: 17543875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group.
    Steinert RF; Hersh PS
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1998; 96():197-221; discussion 221-7. PubMed ID: 10360290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors of visual outcomes following Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation.
    Ahmad S; Akpek EK; Gehlbach PL; Dunlap K; Ramulu PY
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 159(4):739-47. PubMed ID: 25555801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of an ultraviolet light adjustable intraocular lens implanted after cataract removal: eighteen months follow-up.
    Hengerer FH; Dick HB; Conrad-Hengerer I
    Ophthalmology; 2011 Dec; 118(12):2382-8. PubMed ID: 21872939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.