376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20096606)
1. Metacognition and mindreading: judgments of learning for Self and Other during self-paced study.
Koriat A; Ackerman R
Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):251-64. PubMed ID: 20096606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: a developmental perspective.
Koriat A; Ackerman R; Lockl K; Schneider W
J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Mar; 102(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 19084238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition.
Zaromb FM; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):552-7. PubMed ID: 20192550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.
Koriat A; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1133-45. PubMed ID: 16938051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attributing study effort to data-driven and goal-driven effects: implications for metacognitive judgments.
Koriat A; Nussinson R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1338-43. PubMed ID: 19686026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metacognitive monitoring of oneself and others: developmental changes during childhood and adolescence.
Paulus M; Tsalas N; Proust J; Sodian B
J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Jun; 122():153-65. PubMed ID: 24607803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metacognition, metamemory, and mindreading in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder.
Grainger C; Williams DM; Lind SE
J Abnorm Psychol; 2014 Aug; 123(3):650-9. PubMed ID: 24955572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A stochastic detection and retrieval model for the study of metacognition.
Jang Y; Wallsten TS; Huber DE
Psychol Rev; 2012 Jan; 119(1):186-200. PubMed ID: 22059901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior.
Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Nussinson R
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Feb; 135(1):36-69. PubMed ID: 16478315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice.
Koriat A; Sheffer L; Ma'ayan H
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Jun; 131(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 12049237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metacognition in prospective memory: are performance predictions accurate?
Schnitzspahn KM; Zeintl M; Jäger T; Kliegel M
Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Mar; 65(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 21443326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
Jang Y; Nelson TO
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting one's own forgetting: the role of experience-based and theory-based processes.
Koriat A; Bjork RA; Sheffer L; Bar SK
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Dec; 133(4):643-56. PubMed ID: 15584811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metacognitive awareness of event-based prospective memory.
Thadeus Meeks J; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
Conscious Cogn; 2007 Dec; 16(4):997-1004. PubMed ID: 17052920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age-related differences in the relation between monitoring and control of learning.
Souchay C; Isingrini M
Exp Aging Res; 2004; 30(2):179-93. PubMed ID: 15204631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of the difficulty of prior items on the magnitude of judgments of learning for subsequent items.
Richards RM; Nelson TO
Am J Psychol; 2004; 117(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 15058858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using a multidimensional scaling approach to investigate the underlying basis of ease of learning judgments.
Jönsson FU; Lindström BR
Scand J Psychol; 2010 Apr; 51(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 19958466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Normative multitrial recall performance, metacognitive judgments, and retrieval latencies for Lithuanian-English paired associates.
Grimaldi PJ; Pyc MA; Rawson KA
Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):634-42. PubMed ID: 20805585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
