These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20097075)

  • 1. Laboratory measurement of the interface pressures applied by active therapy support surfaces: a consensus document.
    Tissue Viability Society
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Feb; 19(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 20097075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of alternating air mattresses using a time-based interface pressure threshold technique.
    Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jun; 35(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 9651895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of pressure relief using interface pressure and tissue perfusion in alternating pressure air mattresses.
    Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Oct; 81(10):1364-9. PubMed ID: 11030502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pressure relief capabilities of the Sof.Care bed and the Clinitron bed.
    Maklebust J; Siggreen MY; Mondoux L
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1988; 21():32, 36-41, 44. PubMed ID: 3250579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interface pressure measurements of support surfaces with subjects in the supine and 45-degree Fowler positions.
    Whittemore R; Bautista C; Smith C; Bruttomesso K
    J ET Nurs; 1993; 20(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 8347757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The NPUAP Support Surface Initiative.
    Edsberg L; Geyer MJ; Zulkowski K
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2005 Apr; 18(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 15840988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The evaluation of five specialized support surfaces by use of a pressure-sensitive mat.
    Patel UH; Jones JT; Babbs CF; Bourland JD; Graber GP
    Decubitus; 1993 May; 6(3):28-31, 34, 36-7. PubMed ID: 8347281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standardizing performance-based criteria for support surfaces.
    Krouskop T; van Rijswijk L
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995; 41(1):34-6, 38, 40-5. PubMed ID: 7779232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of air-fluidized therapy with other support surfaces used to treat pressure ulcers in nursing home residents.
    Ochs RF; Horn SD; van Rijswijk L; Pietsch C; Smout RJ
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Feb; 51(2):38-68. PubMed ID: 15699554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Management of tissue load: An excerpt from the third NPUAP Slide Set. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel.
    Adv Wound Care; 1997 Oct; 10(6):35-8. PubMed ID: 9369545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Principles of alternating pressure surfaces.
    McLeod AG
    Adv Wound Care; 1997; 10(7):30-6. PubMed ID: 9450404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interface pressure comparison of healthy premature infants with various neonatal bed surfaces.
    Turnage-Carrier C; McLane KM; Gregurich MA
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2008 Jun; 8(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 18535423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing reactive air and active alternating pressure mattresses in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers among medical ICU patients.
    Malbrain M; Hendriks B; Wijnands P; Denie D; Jans A; Vanpellicom J; De Keulenaer B
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Feb; 19(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 20079647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Support surfaces: beds, mattresses, overlays-oh my!
    Mackey D
    Nurs Clin North Am; 2005 Jun; 40(2):251-65. PubMed ID: 15924893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laboratory performance of alternating pressure air mattresses component and sequelae.
    Bain D
    Br J Nurs; 2011 Nov 10-23; 20(20):S29-34. PubMed ID: 22067933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nimbus 3 alternating-pressure replacement mattress.
    Young T
    Br J Nurs; 1998 Apr 9-22; 7(7):409-12. PubMed ID: 9668757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Body support testing and rating.
    Rogers JE
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1992 Aug; 14(1):63-78. PubMed ID: 10120049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Continuous monitoring of interface pressure distribution in intensive care patients for pressure ulcer prevention.
    Sakai K; Sanada H; Matsui N; Nakagami G; Sugama J; Komiyama C; Yahagi N
    J Adv Nurs; 2009 Apr; 65(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19228239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The value of systematic evaluation in determining the effectiveness and practical utility of a pressure-redistributing support surface.
    Ward C
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Feb; 19(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20106665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the need for developing a comprehensive content-validated pressure ulcer guideline.
    Bolton L; Girolami S; Slayton S; Berger TM; Foster L; Whittington KT; Merkle D;
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2008 Nov; 54(11):22-30. PubMed ID: 19037134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.