These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20098182)
1. Implant platform switching: biomechanical approach using two-dimensional finite element analysis. Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Adelino Ricardo Barão V; de Sousa EA; Gomes EA; Delben JA J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):182-7. PubMed ID: 20098182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical repercussions of bone resorption related to biologic width: a finite element analysis of three implant-abutment configurations. Rodríguez-Ciurana X; Vela-Nebot X; Segalà-Torres M; Rodado-Alonso C; Méndez-Blanco V; Mata-Bugueroles M Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Oct; 29(5):479-87. PubMed ID: 19888491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale? Maeda Y; Miura J; Taki I; Sogo M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):581-4. PubMed ID: 17608737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type. Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study. Hürzeler M; Fickl S; Zuhr O; Wachtel HC J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 65(7 Suppl 1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17586347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses. Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stress analysis in platform-switching implants: a 3-dimensional finite element study. Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Júnior JF; de Carvalho PS; de Moraes SL; Noritomi PY J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 20932121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis. Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone. Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stress analysis in simulation models with or without implant threads representation. Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; de Sousa EA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1040-4. PubMed ID: 20162107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface. Canay S; Akça K Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 19509534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The dynamic natures of implant loading. Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of single-standing or connected implants on stress distribution in bone of mandibular overdentures: a two-dimensional finite element analysis. Tabata LF; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Gomes EA; Delben JA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):696-702. PubMed ID: 20485031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analyzing the effects of the platform-switching procedure on stresses in the bone and implant-abutment complex by 3-dimensional fem analysis. Cimen H; Yengin E J Oral Implantol; 2012 Feb; 38(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 20662671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis. Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis. Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]