These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20098630)

  • 1. Training listeners to identify the sounds of speech: I. A review of past studies.
    Watson CS; Miller JD; Kewley-Port D; Humes LE; Wightman FL
    Hear J; 2008 Sep; 61(9):26. PubMed ID: 20098630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Formant discrimination of speech and non-speech sounds for English and Chinese listeners.
    Liu C; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):EL189-95. PubMed ID: 22979831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of Children's Productions of /l/: Acoustic Correlates and Effects of Listener Experience.
    Coniglio EA; Chung H; Schellinger SK
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2022; 74(6):392-406. PubMed ID: 35367979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of degraded speech sounds differs in chinchilla and human listeners.
    Shofner WP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):2065-77. PubMed ID: 25235004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory detection of non-speech and speech stimuli in noise: Effects of listeners' native language background.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):2782-90. PubMed ID: 26627754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Listeners' identification and discrimination of digitally manipulated sounds as prolongations.
    Kawai N; Healey EC; Carrell TD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1102-10. PubMed ID: 17672657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.
    Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 19773659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of intraphonemic differences by phoneticians, musicians, and inexperienced listeners.
    Hillenbrand J; Canter GJ; Smith BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):655-62. PubMed ID: 2212288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implicit Talker Training Improves Comprehension of Auditory Speech in Noise.
    Kreitewolf J; Mathias SR; von Kriegstein K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1584. PubMed ID: 28959226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of age and hearing loss on auditory stream segregation of speech sounds.
    David M; Tausend AN; Strelcyk O; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():118-128. PubMed ID: 29602593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of dynamic-range compression on the spatial attributes of sounds in normal-hearing listeners.
    Wiggins IM; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):399-410. PubMed ID: 22246139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listeners' identification of environmental sounds.
    Lass NJ; Eastham SK; Parrish WC; Scherbick KA; Ralph DM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Aug; 55(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 7133923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automaticity in speech perception: some speech/nonspeech comparisons.
    Johnson K; Ralston JV
    Phonetica; 1994; 51(4):195-209. PubMed ID: 7938203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regressive spectral assimilation bias in speech perception.
    Rysling A; Jesse A; Kingston J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1127-1146. PubMed ID: 31114954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of fast, slow, and adaptive amplitude compression on children's and adults' perception of meaningful acoustic information.
    Pittman AL; Pederson AJ; Rash MA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):834-47. PubMed ID: 25405839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequential stream segregation of voiced and unvoiced speech sounds based on fundamental frequency.
    David M; Lavandier M; Grimault N; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():235-243. PubMed ID: 27923739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Training listeners to identify the sounds of speech: II. Using SPATS software.
    Miller JD; Watson CS; Kistler DJ; Preminger JE; Wark DJ
    Hear J; 2008 Oct; 61(10):29-33. PubMed ID: 20209044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationship between inexperienced listeners' perceptions and acoustic correlates of children's /r/ productions.
    Klein HB; Grigos MI; McAllister Byun T; Davidson L
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2012 Jul; 26(7):628-45. PubMed ID: 22690718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.