These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20098698)

  • 1. Dermatoglyphics from all Chinese ethnic groups reveal geographic patterning.
    Zhang HG; Chen YF; Ding M; Jin L; Case DT; Jiao YP; Wang XP; Bai CX; Jin G; Yang JM; Wang H; Yuan JB; Huang W; Wang ZG; Chen RB
    PLoS One; 2010 Jan; 5(1):e8783. PubMed ID: 20098698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complex segregation analysis of quantitative dermatoglyphic traits in five Indian populations.
    Karmakar B; Yakovenko K; Kobyliansky E
    Ann Hum Biol; 2005; 32(4):445-68. PubMed ID: 16147395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recent developments in the study of human biology in China: a review.
    Etler DA
    Hum Biol; 1992 Aug; 64(4):567-85. PubMed ID: 1644424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethiopian population dermatoglyphic study reveals linguistic stratification of diversity.
    Yohannes S; Bekele E
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0126897. PubMed ID: 26042929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patterns of ethnic, linguistic, and geographic heterogeneity of palmar interdigital ridge counts in the Indian subcontinent.
    Reddy BM; Demarchi DA; Bharati S; Kumar V; Crawford MH
    Hum Biol; 2004 Apr; 76(2):211-28. PubMed ID: 15359532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of palmar dermatoglyphics in two ethnic Indian populations of north Bengal, India.
    Sen J; Kanchan T; Mondal N
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20840285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A dermatoglyphic study of the Amis aboriginal population of Taiwan.
    Chen YF; Zhang H; Shen CF; Lai CH
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2008 Jan; 51(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 18176795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The study of dermatoglyphic parameters on 1000 Tibetans].
    Wang XP; Qi M; Qiong D; Gao H; Guo WM; Zhan WH; Zhang HG; Shen RC; Chen RB
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1991; 18(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 1781997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A dermatoglyphic survey of Kenyan schoolchildren.
    Rosa PJ
    Ann Hum Biol; 1983; 10(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 6651215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual dimorphism in two types of dermatoglyphic traits in the Turkmenian population of Russia: principal component analysis.
    Karmakar B; Kobyliansky E
    Anthropol Anz; 2009 Sep; 67(3):253-68. PubMed ID: 20405699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dermatoglyphic fingerprint heterogeneity among individuals with nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate and their unaffected relatives in China and the Philippines.
    Scott NM; Weinberg SM; Neiswanger K; Brandon CA; Daack-Hirsch S; Murray JC; Liu YE; Marazita ML
    Hum Biol; 2005 Apr; 77(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 16201141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual dimorphism in the Chuvashian population of Russia in two types of dermatoglyphic traits: principal component analysis.
    Karmakar B; Yakovenko K; Kobyliansky E
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Jun; 32(2):467-77. PubMed ID: 18756897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital dermatoglyphic patterns of Eskimo and Amerindian populations: relationships between geographic, dermatoglyphic, genetic, and linguistic distances.
    Crawford MH; Duggirala R
    Hum Biol; 1992 Oct; 64(5):683-704. PubMed ID: 1398610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dermatoglyphic studies among the two breeding isolates of Gujjars of northwestern India.
    Balgir RS; Sharma JC
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1986 Dec; 71(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 3812661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dermatoglyphic variation in Spanish Basque populations.
    Arrieta I; Martínez B; Criado B; Télez M; Ortega B; Peñagarikano O; Lostao CM
    Hum Biol; 2003 Apr; 75(2):265-91. PubMed ID: 12943163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Qualitative dermatoglyphic traits as measures of population distance.
    Kamali MS; Mavalwala J; Khaneqah AA; Bhanu BV
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1991 Aug; 85(4):429-50. PubMed ID: 1928316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Population structure of the Chenchu and other south Indian tribal groups: relationships between genetic, anthropometric, dermatoglyphic, geographic, and linguistic distances.
    Sirajuddin SM; Duggirala R; Crawford MH
    Hum Biol; 1994 Oct; 66(5):865-84. PubMed ID: 8001914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Latent structure of dermatoglyphs in the population of Selska Valley.
    Milicić J; Vidovic M
    Homo; 2005; 56(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16130839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ethnic diversity in Punjab as based on finger dermatoglyphics.
    Bansal IJ; Bhanwer AJ; Pal P; Sharma VK
    Anthropol Anz; 1979 Oct; 37(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 518046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Polymorphism of palmar main line terminations as an indicator of relationships among Sardinian linguistic groups of males.
    Sanna E; Floris G
    Hum Biol; 1995 Apr; 67(2):265-82. PubMed ID: 7729828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.