These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20099553)

  • 1. A test of a proposed method for estimating validity of a multivariate composite predictor: extending the job component validity model.
    Hoffman CC; Morris D; Luck G
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):900-16. PubMed ID: 20099553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positive manifold limits the relevance of content-matching strategies for validating selection test batteries.
    Murphy KR; Dzieweczynski JL; Zhang Y
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Jul; 94(4):1018-31. PubMed ID: 19594241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: the validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Putka DJ; Campbell JP
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jan; 96(1):13-33. PubMed ID: 20919794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: an updated meta-analysis.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Raymark PH; Odle-Dusseau HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 May; 97(3):499-530. PubMed ID: 21319880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Roth PL; Putka DJ; Lanivich SE
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Nov; 96(6):1167-94. PubMed ID: 21744941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Job-specific applicant pools and national norms for cognitive ability tests: implications for range restriction corrections in validation research.
    Sackett PR; Ostgaard DJ
    J Appl Psychol; 1994 Oct; 79(5):680-4. PubMed ID: 7989275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment centers versus cognitive ability tests: Challenging the conventional wisdom on criterion-related validity.
    Sackett PR; Shewach OR; Keiser HN
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Oct; 102(10):1435-1447. PubMed ID: 28530416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The validity and incremental validity of knowledge tests, low-fidelity simulations, and high-fidelity simulations for predicting job performance in advanced-level high-stakes selection.
    Lievens F; Patterson F
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):927-40. PubMed ID: 21480685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can I retake it? Exploring subgroup differences and criterion-related validity in promotion retesting.
    Van Iddekinge CH; Morgeson FP; Schleicher DJ; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):941-55. PubMed ID: 21517142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of maximal reliability for multiple-component instruments in multilevel designs.
    Raykov T; Penev S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):129-42. PubMed ID: 18001517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
    Chan W; Chan DW
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Who r u?: On the (in)accuracy of incumbent-based estimates of range restriction in criterion-related and differential validity research.
    Roth PL; Le H; Oh IS; Van Iddekinge CH; Robbins SB
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 May; 102(5):802-828. PubMed ID: 28150987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Faking and the validity of conscientiousness: a Monte Carlo investigation.
    Komar S; Brown DJ; Komar JA; Robie C
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jan; 93(1):140-54. PubMed ID: 18211141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using individual differences to predict job performance: correcting for direct and indirect restriction of range.
    Sjöberg S; Sjöberg A; Näswall K; Sverke M
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 22612634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determinants of enlisted air traffic controller success.
    Carretta TR; Siem FM
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1999 Sep; 70(9):910-8. PubMed ID: 10503758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. I answered the call-now please give me a job.
    Reeder P
    Am J Nurs; 2011 Apr; 111(4):11. PubMed ID: 21451278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Personality and job performance: the Big Five revisited.
    Hurtz GM; Donovan JJ
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Dec; 85(6):869-79. PubMed ID: 11125652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Racial/ethnic differences in the criterion-related validity of cognitive ability tests: a qualitative and quantitative review.
    Berry CM; Clark MA; McClure TK
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Sep; 96(5):881-906. PubMed ID: 21443313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do candidate reactions relate to job performance or affect criterion-related validity? A multistudy investigation of relations among reactions, selection test scores, and job performance.
    McCarthy JM; Van Iddekinge CH; Lievens F; Kung MC; Sinar EF; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Sep; 98(5):701-19. PubMed ID: 23937298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oncology Nursing Society Life Cycle Task Force report: the life cycle of the oncology nurse.
    McDonnell KK; Ferrell BR
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1992; 19(10):1545-50. PubMed ID: 1461769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.