These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20099603)
1. Samplers for evaluation and quantification of ultra-low volume space sprays. Farooq M; Hoffmann WC; Walker TW; Smith VL; Robinson CA; Dunford JC; Sutherland IW J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2009 Dec; 25(4):521-4. PubMed ID: 20099603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A droplet collection device and support system for ultra-low-volume adulticide trials. Clayson PJ; Latham M; Bonds JA; Healy SP; Crans SC; Farajollahi A J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2010 Jun; 26(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 20649136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deposition from Ultra-Low Volume Application of Public Health Insecticides in a Hot Desert Environment. Fisher ML; Hoel DF; Farooq M; Walker TW J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2015 Jun; 31(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 26181691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Off-target loss in ornamental nurseries with different spray techniques. Zhu H; Derksen RC; Krause CR; Zondag RH Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 20218508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Nozzle Orientation on Dispersion of Aqualuer 20-20 Sprayed by a Truck-Mounted Ultra-Low Volume Sprayer Against Caged Aedes aegypti. Farooq M; Fulcher A; Xue RD; Smith ML; Anderson JL; Richardson AR; Knapp JA J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2017 Sep; 33(3):209-214. PubMed ID: 28854107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of truck-mounted atomization equipment typically used in vector control. Hoffmann WC; Walker TW; Martin DE; Barber JA; Gwinn T; Smith VL; Szumlas D; Lan Y; Fritz BK J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2007 Sep; 23(3):321-9. PubMed ID: 17939514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Downwind drift and deposition of malathion on human targets from ground ultra-low volume mosquito sprays. Moore JC; Dukes JC; Clark JR; Malone J; Hallmon CF; Hester PG J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1993 Jun; 9(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 8102391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model. Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A critical review of ultralow-volume aerosols of insecticide applied with vehicle-mounted generators for adult mosquito control. Mount GA J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1998 Sep; 14(3):305-34. PubMed ID: 9813829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source. Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spray characterization of ultra-low-volume sprayers typically used in vector control. Hoffmann WC; Walker TW; Fritz BK; Farooq M; Smith VL; Robinson CA; Szumlas D; Lan Y J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2009 Sep; 25(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 19852224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of different sampling techniques for the evaluation of pesticide spray drift in apple orchards. Briand O; Bertrand F; Seux R; Millet M Sci Total Environ; 2002 Apr; 288(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 11991524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a tractor cab using real-time aerosol counting instrumentation. Hall RM; Heitbrink WA; Reed LD Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Jan; 17(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11800406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An open-field efficacy trial using AquaDuet via an ultra-low volume cold aerosol sprayer against caged Aedes albopictus. Farajollahi A; Williams GM J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2013 Sep; 29(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 24199509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spray drift reduction under Southern European conditions: a pilot study in the Ecopest Project in Greece. Kasiotis KM; Glass CR; Tsakirakis AN; Machera K Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 479-480():132-7. PubMed ID: 24561292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of air support on droplet characteristics and spray drift. Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 18399426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air. Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of collectors of airborne spray drift. Experiments in a wind tunnel and field measurements. Arvidsson T; Bergström L; Kreuger J Pest Manag Sci; 2011 Jun; 67(6):725-33. PubMed ID: 21445941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aerosol sampling: comparison of two rotating impactors for field droplet sizing and volumetric measurements. Bonds JA; Greer MJ; Fritz BK; Hoffmann WC J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2009 Dec; 25(4):474-9. PubMed ID: 20099595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]