These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20099932)

  • 21. Relative complexation energies for Li(+) ion in solution: molecular level solvation versus polarizable continuum model study.
    Eilmes A; Kubisiak P
    J Phys Chem A; 2010 Jan; 114(2):973-9. PubMed ID: 20030307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving the performance of the coupled reference interaction site model-hyper-netted chain (RISM-HNC)/simulation method for free energy of solvation.
    Freedman H; Le L; Tuszynski JA; Truong TN
    J Phys Chem B; 2008 Feb; 112(8):2340-8. PubMed ID: 18251537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What determines the van der Waals coefficient beta in the LIE (linear interaction energy) method to estimate binding free energies using molecular dynamics simulations?
    Wang W; Wang J; Kollman PA
    Proteins; 1999 Feb; 34(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 10024025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Absolute free energies of binding of peptide analogs to the HIV-1 protease from molecular dynamics simulations.
    Bartels C; Widmer A; Ehrhardt C
    J Comput Chem; 2005 Sep; 26(12):1294-305. PubMed ID: 15981257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of the binding energies of testosterone, 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone, androstenedione and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate with an antitestosterone antibody.
    Nordman N; Valjakka J; Peräkylä M
    Proteins; 2003 Jan; 50(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 12471606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modeling loop reorganization free energies of acetylcholinesterase: a comparison of explicit and implicit solvent models.
    Olson MA
    Proteins; 2004 Dec; 57(4):645-50. PubMed ID: 15481087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Linear response theory: an alternative to PB and GB methods for the analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories?
    Morreale A; de la Cruz X; Meyer T; Gelpí JL; Luque FJ; Orozco M
    Proteins; 2004 Nov; 57(3):458-67. PubMed ID: 15382247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Scoring binding affinity of multiple ligands using implicit solvent and a single molecular dynamics trajectory: application to influenza neuraminidase.
    Bonnet P; Bryce RA
    J Mol Graph Model; 2005 Oct; 24(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 16098779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A multistep approach to structure-based drug design: studying ligand binding at the human neutrophil elastase.
    Steinbrecher T; Case DA; Labahn A
    J Med Chem; 2006 Mar; 49(6):1837-44. PubMed ID: 16539369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A computational analysis of the binding affinities of FKBP12 inhibitors using the MM-PB/SA method.
    Xu Y; Wang R
    Proteins; 2006 Sep; 64(4):1058-68. PubMed ID: 16838311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Protein/ligand binding free energies calculated with quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics.
    Gräter F; Schwarzl SM; Dejaegere A; Fischer S; Smith JC
    J Phys Chem B; 2005 May; 109(20):10474-83. PubMed ID: 16852269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Binding free energies and free energy components from molecular dynamics and Poisson-Boltzmann calculations. Application to amino acid recognition by aspartyl-tRNA synthetase.
    Archontis G; Simonson T; Karplus M
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Feb; 306(2):307-27. PubMed ID: 11237602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mapping the binding site of a large set of quinazoline type EGF-R inhibitors using molecular field analyses and molecular docking studies.
    Hou T; Zhu L; Chen L; Xu X
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(1):273-87. PubMed ID: 12546563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
    Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of atomic charge, solvation, entropy, and ligand protonation state on MM-PB(GB)SA binding energies of HIV protease.
    Oehme DP; Brownlee RT; Wilson DJ
    J Comput Chem; 2012 Dec; 33(32):2566-80. PubMed ID: 22915442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative binding energy analysis of HIV-1 protease inhibitors: incorporation of solvent effects and validation as a powerful tool in receptor-based drug design.
    Pérez C; Pastor M; Ortiz AR; Gago F
    J Med Chem; 1998 Mar; 41(6):836-52. PubMed ID: 9526559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Analyzing the robustness of the MM/PBSA free energy calculation method: application to DNA conformational transitions.
    Brice AR; Dominy BN
    J Comput Chem; 2011 May; 32(7):1431-40. PubMed ID: 21284003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An efficient mean solvation force model for use in molecular dynamics simulations of proteins in aqueous solution.
    Fraternali F; Van Gunsteren WF
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Mar; 256(5):939-48. PubMed ID: 8601844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The solvated interaction energy method for scoring binding affinities.
    Sulea T; Purisima EO
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 819():295-303. PubMed ID: 22183544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reduction potentials and acidity constants of Mn superoxide dismutase calculated by QM/MM free-energy methods.
    Heimdal J; Kaukonen M; Srnec M; Rulíšek L; Ryde U
    Chemphyschem; 2011 Dec; 12(17):3337-47. PubMed ID: 21960467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.