These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20100395)

  • 1. The fate of activated information in impression formation: fluency of concept activation moderates the emergence of assimilation versus contrast.
    Greifeneder R; Bless H
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2010 Jun; 49(Pt 2):405-14. PubMed ID: 20100395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation.
    Alter AL; Oppenheimer DM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2009 Aug; 13(3):219-35. PubMed ID: 19638628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment.
    Förster J; Liberman N; Kuschel S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):579-99. PubMed ID: 18361673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Set/reset: use and disuse of concepts in impression formation.
    Martin LL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1986 Sep; 51(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 3761145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Going back to Donald: how comparisons shape judgmental priming effects.
    Mussweiler T; Damisch L
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Dec; 95(6):1295-315. PubMed ID: 19025284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-activation and out-group contrast.
    Hall NR; Crisp RJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(5):423-7. PubMed ID: 21058572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primacy of functional knowledge in semantic representations: the case of living and nonliving things.
    Phelps FG; Macken WJ; Barry C; Miles C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Nov; 59(11):1984-2009. PubMed ID: 16987785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the road to self-perception: interpretation of self-behaviors can be altered by priming.
    Skowronski JJ; Sedikides C; Heider JD; Wood SE; Scherer CR
    J Pers; 2010 Feb; 78(1):361-91. PubMed ID: 20433623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of social cues and task complexity in concept identification.
    Wolfgang A
    J Educ Psychol; 1967 Feb; 58(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 6044473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interference between cues of the same outcome depends on the causal interpretation of the events.
    Cobos PL; López FJ; Luque D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):369-86. PubMed ID: 17366306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Politeness and conditional reasoning: interpersonal cues to the indirect suppression of deductive inferences.
    Demeure V; Bonnefon JF; Raufaste E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):260-6. PubMed ID: 19210096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of prior beliefs in the assignment of causal roles: causal powers versus regularity-based accounts.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Mar; 23(2):243-54. PubMed ID: 7731368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parallel response selection in dual-task situations via automatic category-to-response translation.
    Thomson SJ; Watter S; Finkelshtein A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1791-802. PubMed ID: 20952778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A rose in any other font would not smell as sweet: effects of perceptual fluency on categorization.
    Oppenheimer DM; Frank MC
    Cognition; 2008 Mar; 106(3):1178-94. PubMed ID: 17618616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast and assimilation in categorization and exemplar production.
    Zotov V; Jones MN; Mewhort DJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):621-39. PubMed ID: 21264728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can priming your self lead to punishing others?
    Sandry J; Hunt G; Rice S; Trafimow D; Geels K
    J Soc Psychol; 2011; 151(5):531-4. PubMed ID: 22017071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of processing fluency on impressions of familiarity and liking.
    Westerman DL; Lanska M; Olds JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):426-38. PubMed ID: 25528088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How different types of conceptual relations modulate brain activation during semantic priming.
    Sachs O; Weis S; Zellagui N; Sass K; Huber W; Zvyagintsev M; Mathiak K; Kircher T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1263-73. PubMed ID: 20350178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A flexible impact of affective feelings on priming effects: assimilation and contrast.
    Huntsinger JR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Apr; 40(4):450-62. PubMed ID: 24345713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.