These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20100594)

  • 1. Critical comments on DNA breakage by mobile-phone electromagnetic fields [Diem et al., Mutat. Res. 583 (2005) 178-183].
    Lerchl A; Wilhelm AF
    Mutat Res; 2010 Mar; 697(1-2):60-5. PubMed ID: 20100594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are environmental electromagnetic fields genotoxic?
    Crumpton MJ; Collins AR
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2004 Oct; 3(10):1385-7. PubMed ID: 15336633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comments on: "DNA strand breaks" by Diem et al. [Mutat. Res. 583 (2005) 178-183] and Ivancsits et al. [Mutat. Res. 583 (2005) 184-188].
    Vijayalaxmi ; McNamee JP; Scarfi MR
    Mutat Res; 2006 Jan; 603(1):104-6; author reply 107-9. PubMed ID: 16384726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comments on "Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (UMTS, 1,950 MHz) induce genotoxic effects in vitro in human fibroblasts but not in lymphocytes" by Schwarz et al. (Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2008: doi: 10.1007/s00420-008-0305-5).
    Lerchl A
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2009 Jan; 82(2):275-8. PubMed ID: 18437412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. University calls for mobile phone research to be withdrawn after technician admits faking data.
    Tuffs A
    BMJ; 2008 Jun; 336(7656):1270. PubMed ID: 18535061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comments on "Association of excessive mobile phone use during pregnancy with birth weight: an adjunct study in Kumamoto of Japan Environment and Children's Study".
    Mortazavi G; Mortazavi SAR; Mortazavi SMJ
    Environ Health Prev Med; 2017 Sep; 22(1):67. PubMed ID: 29165158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comments on "Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and some cancers of unknown etiology: An ecological study".
    Mortazavi SAR; Mortazavi G; Mortazavi SMJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 609():1. PubMed ID: 28732291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comments regarding: "Occupational exposure to high-frequency electromagnetic fields and brain tumor risk in the INTEROCC study: An individualized assessment approach".
    Mortazavi SMJ
    Environ Int; 2018 Dec; 121(Pt 1):1024. PubMed ID: 30146273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The genotoxic potential of electric and magnetic fields: an update.
    McCann J; Dietrich F; Rafferty C
    Mutat Res; 1998 Aug; 411(1):45-86. PubMed ID: 9675241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.
    Colombini D; Occhipinti E
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jul; 44(4):436-438. PubMed ID: 29961081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Data fabrication and other reasons for non-random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals.
    Carlisle JB
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Aug; 72(8):944-952. PubMed ID: 28580651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are these data real? Comments on "No effects of intermittent 50 Hz EMF on cytoplasmic free calcium and on the mitochondrial membrane potential in human diploid fibroblasts." by Pilger et al. (Radiat Environ Biophys 43:203-7 (2004)).
    Lerchl A
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2010 Aug; 49(3):491-3; author reply 495-7. PubMed ID: 20364265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific misconduct. Fraud charges cast doubt on claims of DNA damage from cell phone fields.
    Vogel G
    Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5893):1144-5. PubMed ID: 18755946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Letter to the editor: doubts raised about the blinding process do not apply to the Diem et al. paper.
    Rüdiger HW
    Mutat Res; 2009 Feb; 673(1):2. PubMed ID: 19059497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychomotor effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields.
    Valentini E; Ferrara M; Presaghi F; De Gennaro L; Curcio G
    Occup Environ Med; 2010 Oct; 67(10):708-16. PubMed ID: 20837651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Letter to the Editor on 'Effects of exposure to a mobile phone on testicular function and structure in adult rabbit' by Salama et al.
    Lerchl A; Bornkessel C
    Int J Androl; 2010 Feb; 33(1):95; author reply 96-7. PubMed ID: 19674161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retracted publications in the drug literature.
    Samp JC; Schumock GT; Pickard AS
    Pharmacotherapy; 2012 Jul; 32(7):586-95. PubMed ID: 22581659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Publication rates after the first retraction for biomedical researchers with multiple retracted publications.
    Mistry V; Grey A; Bolland MJ
    Account Res; 2019 Jul; 26(5):277-287. PubMed ID: 31025884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. RETRACTED: Homocysteine as a predictive factor for hip fracture in elderly women with Parkinson's disease.
    Sato Y; Iwamoto J; Kanoko T; Satoh K
    Am J Med; 2005 Nov; 118(11):1250-5. PubMed ID: 16271909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Authors' Reply to Drießen's Letter to the Editor on "A novel database of bio-effects from non-ionizing radiation".
    Leach V; Weller S; Redmayne M
    Rev Environ Health; 2019 Mar; 34(1):101-103. PubMed ID: 30710488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.