These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20100920)
1. In vitro comparison of digital and conventional bitewing radiographs for the detection of approximal caries in primary teeth exposed and viewed by a new wireless handheld unit. Ulusu T; Bodur H; Odabaş ME Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 20100920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro comparison of digital and conventional bitewing radiographs. Aps JK; Berkhout E; Goren AD Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):320; author reply 321. PubMed ID: 20587657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection. Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs. Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of tube potential and image receptor on the detection of natural proximal caries in primary teeth. Sogur E; Baksı BG; Orhan K; Paksoy SC; Dogan S; Erdal YS; Mert A Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 20838834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries. Haak R; Wicht MJ; Nowak G; Hellmich M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The diagnostic accuracy of a laser fluorescence device and digital radiography in detecting approximal caries lesions in posterior permanent teeth: an in vivo study. Menem R; Barngkgei I; Beiruti N; Al Haffar I; Joury E Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(3):621-628. PubMed ID: 28194533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth. Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries. Castro VM; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition. Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection. Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study. Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of interproximal caries using the IPad 2 and a liquid crystal display monitor. Shintaku WH; Scarbecz M; Venturin JS Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 May; 113(5):e40-4. PubMed ID: 22668638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries. Pontual AA; de Melo DP; de Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN; Haiter Neto F Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 20841461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems. Hintze H Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Grey-scale reversed radiographic display in the detection of approximal caries. Haak R; Wicht MJ J Dent; 2005 Jan; 33(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15652170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images. Cederberg RA; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Shulman JD Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 9879219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and visual response. An in vitro study. Li G; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Shi XQ; McDavid WD Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12076051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram. Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Caplan D Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]