150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20101375)
61. Cytology at the time of cervical colposcopy.
Tapisiz OL; Ertan K; Tyner J; Borahay M; Freeman DH; Kilic GS
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(1):36-8. PubMed ID: 23589997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program.
Loopik DL; Koenjer LM; Siebers AG; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):200.e1-200.e9. PubMed ID: 32800820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. A randomized trial on the management of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology interpretations.
ASCUS-LSIL Traige Study (ALTS) Group
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1393-400. PubMed ID: 12824968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Management of abnormal cervical cytology screening in adolescent and young women in a canadian colposcopy centre: a descriptive analysis.
Bouchard-Fortier G; Paszat L; Murphy KJ
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Feb; 35(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 23470065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Cervical squamous and glandular intraepithelial neoplasia: identification and current management approaches.
Wright VC
Salud Publica Mex; 2003; 45 Suppl 3():S417-29. PubMed ID: 14746035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy in detecting early cervical neoplasia: a retrospective study.
Stuebs FA; Schulmeyer CE; Mehlhorn G; Gass P; Kehl S; Renner SK; Renner SP; Geppert C; Adler W; Hartmann A; Beckmann MW; Koch MC
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Feb; 299(2):525-532. PubMed ID: 30367250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Human papillomavirus detection by PCR assay in a large series of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with cytohistological correlation and follow-up.
Lerma Puertas E; Otal Salaverri C; Ríos Martín JJ; Sánchez Gómez A; Jiménez Caraballo A; González-Cámpora R
Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(5):426-32. PubMed ID: 21986169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Cervicovaginal cytology in the detection of recurrence after cervical cancer treatment.
Rimel BJ; Ferda A; Erwin J; Dewdney SB; Seamon L; Gao F; DeSimone C; Cotney KK; Huh W; Massad LS
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 118(3):548-553. PubMed ID: 21860282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Possible high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (pHSIL) in the new cervical screening paradigm: The outcomes and the role of clinicopathological review.
McGauran MFG; Pendlebury AB; Hiscock RJ; Lamont JM; Jones APM; Grant P; Newman MR; Ireland-Jenkin K; McGrath S; Pham K; Hyde S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Aug; 61(4):569-575. PubMed ID: 33939180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Colposcopy in special circumstances: Pregnancy, immunocompromise, including HIV and transplants, adolescence and menopause.
Freeman-Wang T; Walker P
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Oct; 25(5):653-65. PubMed ID: 21843974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Cervical cytologic abnormalities of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 treated with cryotherapy and expectant management during the first year follow-up period.
Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(4):665-8. PubMed ID: 19827891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Management of low-grade cervical dysplasia during pregnancy.
Patsner B
South Med J; 1990 Dec; 83(12):1405-6, 1412. PubMed ID: 2123562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN(2-3)) in pregnant women.
Vlahos G; Rodolakis A; Diakomanolis E; Stefanidis K; Haidopoulos D; Abela K; Georgountzos V; Michalas S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2002; 54(2):78-81. PubMed ID: 12566748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Management of the low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Pap smear in a cross-sectional, observational cohort.
Yoost JL; Goetzl L; Hoda R; Soper DE; Barry A
J Reprod Med; 2009 Jul; 54(7):421-4. PubMed ID: 19691257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. High-grade cervical neoplasia during pregnancy: diagnosis, management and postpartum findings.
Coppolillo EF; DE Ruda Vega HM; Brizuela J; Eliseth MC; Barata A; Perazzi BE
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Mar; 92(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 22880637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. The effect of local photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolevulinic acid for the treatment of cervical low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with high-risk HPV infection: A retrospective study.
Gu L; Cheng M; Hong Z; Di W; Qiu L
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2021 Mar; 33():102172. PubMed ID: 33401023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. [Clinical value of p16
Song FB; Du H; Xiao AM; Wang C; Huang X; Yan PS; Liu ZH; Qu XF; Belinson JEROMEL; Wu RF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):784-790. PubMed ID: 33228350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
