These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20102512)

  • 1. Do microsatellites reflect genome-wide genetic diversity in natural populations? A comment on Väli et al. (2008).
    Ljungqvist M; Akesson M; Hansson B
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Mar; 19(5):851-5. PubMed ID: 20102512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of biallelic markers and microsatellites for the estimation of population and conservation genetic parameters in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Ryynänen HJ; Tonteri A; Vasemägi A; Primmer CR
    J Hered; 2007; 98(7):692-704. PubMed ID: 17986472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To what extent do microsatellite markers reflect genome-wide genetic diversity in natural populations?
    Väli U; Einarsson A; Waits L; Ellegren H
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Sep; 17(17):3808-17. PubMed ID: 18647238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pedigrees and microsatellites among endangered ungulates: what do they tell us?
    Ruiz-López MJ; Roldán ER; Espeso G; Gomendio M
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1352-64. PubMed ID: 19368643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SNPs in ecological and conservation studies: a test in the Scandinavian wolf population.
    Seddon JM; Parker HG; Ostrander EA; Ellegren H
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Feb; 14(2):503-11. PubMed ID: 15660941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use (or misuse) of microsatellite allelic distances in the context of inbreeding and conservation genetics.
    Hansson B
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Mar; 19(6):1082-90. PubMed ID: 20163544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How many SNPs are enough?
    Smouse PE
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(7):1265-6. PubMed ID: 20456228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The imprecision of heterozygosity-fitness correlations hinders the detection of inbreeding and inbreeding depression in a threatened species.
    Grueber CE; Waters JM; Jamieson IG
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Jan; 20(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 21087447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Population structure and conservation genetics of wild rice Oryza rufipogon (Poaceae): a region-wide perspective from microsatellite variation.
    Gao L
    Mol Ecol; 2004 May; 13(5):1009-24. PubMed ID: 15078440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the estimation of genome-wide heterozygosity using molecular markers.
    Dewoody YD; Dewoody JA
    J Hered; 2005; 96(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 15618305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in zebra finches: microsatellite markers can be better than their reputation.
    Forstmeier W; Schielzeth H; Mueller JC; Ellegren H; Kempenaers B
    Mol Ecol; 2012 Jul; 21(13):3237-49. PubMed ID: 22554318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence of parasite-mediated disruptive selection on genetic diversity in a wild fish population.
    Blanchet S; Rey O; Berthier P; Lek S; Loot G
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Mar; 18(6):1112-23. PubMed ID: 19222748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the role of inbreeding depression in heterozygosity-fitness correlations: how useful are tests for identity disequilibrium?
    Kardos M; Allendorf FW; Luikart G
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 May; 14(3):519-30. PubMed ID: 24314098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heterozygosity at a single locus explains a large proportion of variation in two fitness-related traits in great tits: a general or a local effect?
    García-Navas V; Cáliz-Campal C; Ferrer ES; Sanz JJ; Ortego J
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Dec; 27(12):2807-19. PubMed ID: 25370831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations and associative overdominance: new detection method and proof of principle in the Iberian wild boar.
    Malo AF; Coulson T
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Jul; 18(13):2741-2. PubMed ID: 19457188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inbreeding, outbreeding and environmental effects on genetic diversity in 46 walleye (Sander vitreus) populations.
    Cena CJ; Morgan GE; Malette MD; Heath DD
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Feb; 15(2):303-20. PubMed ID: 16448402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multilocus heterozygosity, parental relatedness and individual fitness components in a wild mountain goat, Oreamnos americanus population.
    Mainguy J; Côté SD; Coltman DW
    Mol Ecol; 2009 May; 18(10):2297-306. PubMed ID: 19389162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polygyny can increase rather than decrease genetic diversity contributed by males relative to females: evidence from red deer.
    Pérez-González J; Mateos C; Carranza J
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Apr; 18(8):1591-600. PubMed ID: 19302345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations and inbreeding depression in two critically endangered mammals.
    Ruiz-López MJ; Gañan N; Godoy JA; Del Olmo A; Garde J; Espeso G; Vargas A; Martinez F; Roldán ER; Gomendio M
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Dec; 26(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 22897325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence of opposing fitness effects of parental heterozygosity and relatedness in a critically endangered marine turtle?
    Phillips KP; Jorgensen TH; Jolliffe KG; Richardson DS
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Nov; 30(11):1953-1965. PubMed ID: 28787533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.