732 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20102880)
1. Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery for cardiogenic shock and multivessel coronary artery disease?
Mehta RH; Lopes RD; Ballotta A; Frigiola A; Sketch MH; Bossone E; Bates ER
Am Heart J; 2010 Jan; 159(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 20102880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Balancing benefit against risk in the choice of therapy for coronary artery disease. Lesson from prospective, randomized, clinical trials of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Morrison DA; Sacks J
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2003 Oct; 51(5):585-97. PubMed ID: 14551526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical characteristics and early mortality of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting compared to percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ASCTS) and the Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG) Registries.
Yan BP; Clark DJ; Buxton B; Ajani AE; Smith JA; Duffy SJ; Shardey GC; Skillington PD; Farouque O; Yii M; Yap CH; Andrianopoulos N; Brennan A; Dinh D; Reid CM; ;
Heart Lung Circ; 2009 Jun; 18(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 19268632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial.
White HD; Assmann SF; Sanborn TA; Jacobs AK; Webb JG; Sleeper LA; Wong CK; Stewart JT; Aylward PE; Wong SC; Hochman JS
Circulation; 2005 Sep; 112(13):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 16186436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Javaid A; Steinberg DH; Buch AN; Corso PJ; Boyce SW; Pinto Slottow TL; Roy PK; Hill P; Okabe T; Torguson R; Smith KA; Xue Z; Gevorkian N; Suddath WO; Kent KM; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Circulation; 2007 Sep; 116(11 Suppl):I200-6. PubMed ID: 17846304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting and coronary artery bypass surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis with 5-year patient-level data from the ARTS, ERACI-II, MASS-II, and SoS trials.
Daemen J; Boersma E; Flather M; Booth J; Stables R; Rodriguez A; Rodriguez-Granillo G; Hueb WA; Lemos PA; Serruys PW
Circulation; 2008 Sep; 118(11):1146-54. PubMed ID: 18725490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Should patients in cardiogenic shock undergo rescue angioplasty after failed fibrinolysis: comparison of primary versus rescue angioplasty in cardiogenic shock patients.
Kunadian B; Vijayalakshmi K; Dunning J; Thornley AR; Sutton AG; Muir DF; Wright RA; Hall JA; de Belder MA
J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 May; 19(5):217-23. PubMed ID: 17476036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PCI versus CABG for multivessel coronary disease in diabetics.
Tarantini G; Ramondo A; Napodano M; Favaretto E; Gardin A; Bilato C; Nesseris G; Tarzia V; Cademartiri F; Gerosa G; Iliceto S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Jan; 73(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 19089938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease: results from the ARTS trial in Israel.
Gruberg L; Milo S; Ben Tzvi M; Lotan C; Merin G; Braun S; Mohr R; Tzivoni D; Bitran D; Beyar R;
Isr Med Assoc J; 2003 Aug; 5(8):539-42. PubMed ID: 12929288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary artery disease in the bare-metal stent era.
Kimura T; Morimoto T; Furukawa Y; Nakagawa Y; Shizuta S; Ehara N; Taniguchi R; Doi T; Nishiyama K; Ozasa N; Saito N; Hoshino K; Mitsuoka H; Abe M; Toma M; Tamura T; Haruna Y; Imai Y; Teramukai S; Fukushima M; Kita T
Circulation; 2008 Sep; 118(14 Suppl):S199-209. PubMed ID: 18824755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention: a new paradigm for a new century.
Morrison DA
Minerva Cardioangiol; 2005 Oct; 53(5):361-77. PubMed ID: 16179881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients. 1-year results of the CARDia (Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes) trial.
Kapur A; Hall RJ; Malik IS; Qureshi AC; Butts J; de Belder M; Baumbach A; Angelini G; de Belder A; Oldroyd KG; Flather M; Roughton M; Nihoyannopoulos P; Bagger JP; Morgan K; Beatt KJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Feb; 55(5):432-40. PubMed ID: 20117456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revascularization use and survival outcomes after cardiac catheterization in British Columbia and Alberta.
Thompson CR; Humphries KH; Gao M; Galbraith PD; Norris C; Carere RG; Knudtson ML; Ghali WA;
Can J Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 20(14):1417-23. PubMed ID: 15614334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of age on outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery versus stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: one-year results from the Stent or Surgery (SoS) trial.
Zhang Z; Mahoney EM; Spertus JA; Booth J; Nugara F; Kolm P; Stables RH; Weintraub WS
Am Heart J; 2006 Dec; 152(6):1153-60. PubMed ID: 17161069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early and long-term outcomes after surgical and percutaneous myocardial revascularization in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and unprotected left main disease.
Buszman PP; Bochenek A; Konkolewska M; Trela B; Kiesz RS; Wilczyński M; Cisowski M; Krejca M; Banasiewicz-Szkróbka I; Krol M; Kondys M; Wiernek S; Orlik B; Martin JL; Tendera M; Buszman PE
J Invasive Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 21(11):564-9. PubMed ID: 19901409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery provides better survival in patients with acute coronary syndrome or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experiencing cardiogenic shock after percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score analysis.
Chiu FC; Chang SN; Lin JW; Hwang JJ; Chen YS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Dec; 138(6):1326-30. PubMed ID: 19660378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials on long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for multivessel coronary artery disease.
Takagi H; Kawai N; Umemoto T
Am J Cardiol; 2008 May; 101(9):1259-62. PubMed ID: 18435954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multivessel coronary revascularization in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: 3-year follow-up of the ARTS-II (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study-Part II) trial.
Daemen J; Kuck KH; Macaya C; LeGrand V; Vrolix M; Carrie D; Sheiban I; Suttorp MJ; Vranckx P; Rademaker T; Goedhart D; Schuijer M; Wittebols K; Macours N; Stoll HP; Serruys PW;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Dec; 52(24):1957-67. PubMed ID: 19055986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health-related quality of life outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease treated with cardiac surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention or medical management.
Norris CM; Saunders LD; Ghali WA; Brant R; Galbraith PD; Graham M; Faris P; Dzavik V; Knudtson ML;
Can J Cardiol; 2004 Oct; 20(12):1259-66. PubMed ID: 15494780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ability to achieve complete revascularization is associated with improved in-hospital survival in cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction: Manitoba cardiogenic SHOCK Registry investigators.
Hussain F; Philipp RK; Ducas RA; Elliott J; Džavík V; Jassal DS; Tam JW; Roberts D; Garber PJ; Ducas J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Oct; 78(4):540-8. PubMed ID: 21547996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
