BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20103324)

  • 1. Third-time aortic valve replacement: patient characteristics and operative outcome.
    Shaikhrezai K; Tasca G; Amrani M; Dreyfus G; Asimakopoulos G
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 89(2):479-83. PubMed ID: 20103324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival and left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Kato Y; Suehiro S; Shibata T; Sasaki Y; Hirai H
    J Card Surg; 2007; 22(4):314-9. PubMed ID: 17661773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-do aortic valve replacement: does a previous homograft influence the operative outcome?
    Kumar P; Athanasiou T; Ali A; Nair S; Oz BS; DeSouza A; Moat N; Shore DF; Pepper JR
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):904-12; discussion 912-3. PubMed ID: 15597580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early outcome after surgery for active native and prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis.
    Gabbieri D; Dohmen PM; Linneweber J; Grubitzsch H; von Heymann C; Neumann K; Halle E; Konertz WF
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):508-24; discussion 525. PubMed ID: 18980085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Invited commentary.
    Mihaljevic T
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 89(2):484. PubMed ID: 20103325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term results with the Biocor-SJM stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis.
    Vrandecic M; Fantini FA; Filho BG; de O; da C; Vrandecic E
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 11843505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A single-institution experience with the Ross operation over 11 years.
    Böhm JO; Hemmer W; Rein JG; Horke A; Roser D; Blumenstock G; Botha CA
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Feb; 87(2):514-20. PubMed ID: 19161770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Operative risk of reoperative aortic valve replacement.
    Potter DD; Sundt TM; Zehr KJ; Dearani JA; Daly RC; Mullany CJ; McGregor CG; Puga FJ; Schaff HV; Orszulak TA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jan; 129(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 15632830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aortic valve replacement in isolated severe aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction: long-term survival and ventricular recovery.
    Rabus MB; Kirali K; Kayalar N; Tuncer EY; Toker ME; Yakut C
    Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2009 Feb; 9(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 19196573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experience with stentless aortic xenografts.
    Luciani GB; Auriemma S; Casali G; Barozzi L; Lamascese N; Mazzucco A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):794-800. PubMed ID: 11128787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nine-year routine clinical experience of aortic valve replacement with ATS mechanical valves.
    Villemot JP; Lekehal M; Maureira P; Vanhuyse F; Sirbu C; Carteaux JP; Tran N
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Nov; 17(6):648-56. PubMed ID: 19137797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Allografts for aortic valve or root replacement: insights from an 18-year single-center prospective follow-up study.
    Takkenberg JJ; Klieverik LM; Bekkers JA; Kappetein AP; Roos JW; Eijkemans MJ; Bogers AJ
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 May; 31(5):851-9. PubMed ID: 17350857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Freedom SOLO valve for aortic valve replacement: clinical and hemodynamic results from a prospective multicenter trial.
    Beholz S; Repossini A; Livi U; Schepens M; El Gabry M; Matschke K; Trivedi U; Eckel L; Dapunt O; Zamorano JL
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jan; 19(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 20329497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical management of aortic valve disease in the elderly: A retrospective comparative study of valve choice using propensity score analysis.
    Accola KD; Scott ML; Palmer GJ; Thompson PA; Sand ME; Suarez-Cavalier JE; Bott JN; Ebra G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):355-64; discussion 365. PubMed ID: 18751463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mid-term pattern of survival, hemodynamic performance and rate of complications after medtronic freestyle versus homograft full aortic root replacement: results from a prospective randomized trial.
    Melina G; De Robertis F; Gaer JA; Amrani M; Khaghani A; Yacoub MH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):972-5; discussion 975-6. PubMed ID: 15597592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fifteen years follow up with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
    Mykén P; Bech-Hanssen O; Phipps B; Caidahl K
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 10888100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The potential for normal long term survival and morbidity rates after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Lund O; Magnussen K; Knudsen M; Pilegaard H; Nielsen TT; Albrechtsen OK
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 May; 5(3):258-67. PubMed ID: 8793673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aortic valve replacement in patients 80 years and older. Operative risks and long-term results.
    Elayda MA; Hall RJ; Reul RM; Alonzo DM; Gillette N; Reul GJ; Cooley DA
    Circulation; 1993 Nov; 88(5 Pt 2):II11-6. PubMed ID: 8222145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety of remote aortic valve replacement after prior coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Hoff SJ; Merrill WH; Stewart JR; Bender HW
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Jun; 61(6):1689-91; discussion 1691-2. PubMed ID: 8651768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
    Mykén PS
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.