BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20103434)

  • 1. CT colonography: accuracy of initial interpretation by radiographers in routine clinical practice.
    Burling D; Wylie P; Gupta A; Illangovan R; Muckian J; Ahmad R; Marshall M; Taylor SA
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Feb; 65(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 20103434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Virtual colonoscopy: effect of computer-assisted detection (CAD) on radiographer performance.
    Burling D; Moore A; Marshall M; Weldon J; Gillen C; Baldwin R; Smith K; Pickhardt PJ; Honeyfield L; Taylor SA
    Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 18374719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
    Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT colonography training for radiographers--a formal evaluation.
    Haycock A; Burling D; Wylie P; Muckian J; Ilangovan R; Thomas-Gibson S
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Dec; 65(12):997-1004. PubMed ID: 21070904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection.
    Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S; Taylor SA; Burling D; Roddie M; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
    Gastroenterology; 2006 Dec; 131(6):1690-9. PubMed ID: 17087934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CT colonography: influence of 3D viewing and polyp candidate features on interpretation with computer-aided detection.
    Shi R; Schraedley-Desmond P; Napel S; Olcott EW; Jeffrey RB; Yee J; Zalis ME; Margolis D; Paik DS; Sherbondy AJ; Sundaram P; Beaulieu CF
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):768-76. PubMed ID: 16714460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of a unidirectional panoramic 3D endoluminal interpretation technique to traditional 2D and bidirectional 3D interpretation techniques at CT colonography: preliminary observations.
    Lenhart DK; Babb J; Bonavita J; Kim D; Bini EJ; Megibow AJ; Macari M
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Feb; 65(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 20103433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection.
    Hock D; Ouhadi R; Materne R; Aouchria AS; Mancini I; Broussaud T; Magotteaux P; Nchimi A
    Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):860-8. PubMed ID: 18710980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software.
    Taylor SA; Charman SC; Lefere P; McFarland EG; Paulson EK; Yee J; Aslam R; Barlow JM; Gupta A; Kim DH; Miller CM; Halligan S
    Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 18094263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population.
    Summers RM; Handwerker LR; Pickhardt PJ; Van Uitert RL; Deshpande KK; Yeshwant S; Yao J; Franaszek M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):168-74. PubMed ID: 18562741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of computer-aided detection false-positives on reader performance and diagnostic confidence for CT colonography.
    Taylor SA; Brittenden J; Lenton J; Lambie H; Goldstone A; Wylie PN; Tolan D; Burling D; Honeyfield L; Bassett P; Halligan S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1682-9. PubMed ID: 19457835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conspicuity of colorectal polyps at CT colonography: visual assessment, CAD performance, and the important role of polyp height.
    Summers RM; Frentz SM; Liu J; Yao J; Brown L; Louie A; Barlow DS; Jensen DW; Dwyer AJ; Pickhardt PJ; Petrick N
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 19064206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CT colonography interpretation: how to maximize polyp detection and minimize overcalling.
    Park SH; Kim DH
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Mar; 43(3):539-553. PubMed ID: 29404639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography.
    Yoshida H; Näppi J; MacEneaney P; Rubin DT; Dachman AH
    Radiographics; 2002; 22(4):963-79. PubMed ID: 12110726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison.
    Young BM; Fletcher JG; Paulsen SR; Booya F; Johnson CD; Johnson KT; Melton Z; Rodysill D; Mandrekar J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 17179354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT colonography: effect of computer-aided detection of colonic polyps as a second and concurrent reader for general radiologists with moderate experience in CT colonography.
    Mang T; Bogoni L; Anand VX; Chandra D; Curtin AJ; Lev-Toaff AS; Hermosillo G; Noah R; Raykar V; Salganicoff M; Shaw R; Summerton S; Tappouni RF; Ringel H; Weber M; Wolf M; Obuchowski NA
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1466-76. PubMed ID: 24816931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-aided detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography using a Hessian matrix-based algorithm: preliminary study.
    Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee JG; Kim JH; Lefere PA; Han JK; Choi BI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 17579150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CT colonography: role of a second reader CAD paradigm in the initial training of radiologists.
    Neri E; Faggioni L; Regge D; Vagli P; Turini F; Cerri F; Picano E; Giusti S; Bartolozzi C
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):303-9. PubMed ID: 20832219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study.
    Petrick N; Haider M; Summers RM; Yeshwant SC; Brown L; Iuliano EM; Louie A; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 18096536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of radiographers in the evaluation of CT colonographic images.
    Jensch S; van Gelder RE; Florie J; Thomassen-de Graaf MA; Lobé JV; Bossuyt PM; Bipat S; Nio CY; Stoker J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):W249-55. PubMed ID: 17312031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.