These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20103452)

  • 1. Assessment of a disposable trocar for insertion of contraceptive implants.
    Steiner MJ; Boler T; Obhai G; Hubacher D
    Contraception; 2010 Feb; 81(2):140-2. PubMed ID: 20103452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disposable and reusable trocars.
    Watson DI
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995; 3(2-3):140-2. PubMed ID: 7552131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The valve design of disposable and reusable trocars.
    O'Rourke NA
    Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995 Feb; 3(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 7757439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reprocessing of reusable medical devices.
    Malchesky PS; Chamberlain VC; Scott-Conner C; Salis B; Wallace C
    ASAIO J; 1995; 41(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 7640417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The driving force in trocar insertion: a comparison between disposable and reusable trocars.
    Kelty CJ; Super PA; Stoddard CJ
    Surg Endosc; 2000 Nov; 14(11):1045-6. PubMed ID: 11116416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trocars: new data on safety and selection.
    Health Devices; 2000; 29(2-3):67-71. PubMed ID: 10748996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biopsy forceps: reusable or disposable?
    Fireman Z
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Jul; 21(7):1089-92. PubMed ID: 16824057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: disposable and reusable instruments.
    Lau H
    Surg Technol Int; 2006; 15():109-15. PubMed ID: 17029170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single-use trocar: is it possible to reprocess it after the first use?
    dos Santos VS; Zilberstein B; Possari JF; dos Santos MA; Quintanilha AG; Ribeiro U
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2008 Oct; 18(5):464-8. PubMed ID: 18936667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The ultrasonic trocar provides an easy, sharp, bloodless, and repeatable approach to the abdominal cavity.
    Matsumoto S; Kawabe N; Mizuno Y; Shirasugi N; Suzuki H; Umemoto S
    JSLS; 2002; 6(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 12500846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Questions about re-sterilization and reuse of sterile disposable devices].
    Petrás G; Bolváry G
    Orv Hetil; 1995 Oct; 136(43):2339-42. PubMed ID: 7478479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trocars: safety and selection. Emergency Care Research Institute.
    Health Devices; 1998 Nov; 27(11):376-99. PubMed ID: 9859030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intrauterine devices. The optimal long-term contraceptive method?
    Fortney JA; Feldblum PJ; Raymond EG
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Mar; 44(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 10202746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A life cycle assessment of reusable and single-use central venous catheter insertion kits.
    McGain F; McAlister S; McGavin A; Story D
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1073-80. PubMed ID: 22492185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is it safe to reuse disposable laparoscopic trocars? An in vitro testing.
    Chan AC; Ip M; Koehler A; Crisp B; Tam JS; Chung SC
    Surg Endosc; 2000 Nov; 14(11):1042-4. PubMed ID: 11116415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
    Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel subdermal implants. Comparison with other contraceptive methods available in the United States.
    Ashraf T; Arnold SB; Maxfield M
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):791-8. PubMed ID: 7837126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of five different abdominal access trocar systems: analysis of insertion force, removal force, and defect size.
    Shafer DM; Khajanchee Y; Wong J; Swanström LL
    Surg Innov; 2006 Sep; 13(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 17056783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transition from Norplant to Jadelle in a clinic with extensive experience providing contraceptive implants.
    Brache V; Faundes A; Alvarez F; García AG
    Contraception; 2006 Apr; 73(4):364-7. PubMed ID: 16531168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.