144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20104158)
1. Spondylolisthesis: intraobserver and interobserver reliability with regard to the measurement of slip percentage.
McCarty ME; Mehlman CT; Tamai J; Do TT; Crawford AH; Klein G
J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(7):755-9. PubMed ID: 20104158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Redefining the technique for the radiologic measurement of slip in spondylolisthesis.
Bourassa-Moreau E; Mac-Thiong JM; Labelle H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(14):1401-5. PubMed ID: 20505572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A variability study of computerized sagittal sacral radiologic measures.
Wang Z; Parent S; de Guise JA; Labelle H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan; 35(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 20042958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of lumbar lordosis measurement in patients with spondylolisthesis: a case-control study comparing the Cobb, centroid, and posterior tangent methods.
Hwang JH; Modi HN; Suh SW; Hong JY; Park YH; Park JH; Yang JH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(18):1691-700. PubMed ID: 20543767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transvertebral Transsacral strut grafting for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis L5-S1 with fibular allograft.
Sasso RC; Shively KD; Reilly TM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jul; 21(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 18600142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of the Spinal Deformity Study Group classification of lumbosacral spondylolisthesis.
Mac-Thiong JM; Duong L; Parent S; Hresko MT; Dimar JR; Weidenbaum M; Labelle H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan; 37(2):E95-102. PubMed ID: 21629167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation and Reliability Analysis of the Spinal Deformity Study Group Classification for L5-S1 Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
Bao H; Yan P; Zhu W; Bao M; Li Y; Zhang Z; Qiu Y; Zhu F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Nov; 40(21):E1150-4. PubMed ID: 26261917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Not all spondylolisthesis grading instruments are reliable.
Timon SJ; Gardner MJ; Wanich T; Poynton A; Pigeon R; Widmann RF; Rawlins BA; Burke SW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2005 May; (434):157-62. PubMed ID: 15864046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of radiographical measurements of spondylolisthesis and extension-flexion radiographs of the lumbar spine.
Tallroth K; Ylikoski M; Landtman M; Santavirta S
Eur J Radiol; 1994 Aug; 18(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 7957297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of a simple computerized tool for measuring spinal and pelvic parameters.
Kim CH; Chung CK; Hong HS; Kim EH; Kim MJ; Park BJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):154-62. PubMed ID: 22136391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Roentgenologic assessment of spondylolisthesis. I. A study of measurement variations.
Danielson B; Frennered K; Irstam L
Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 2968107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children.
Hensinger RN
Instr Course Lect; 1983; 32():132-51. PubMed ID: 6546062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of film and computer workstation measurements of degenerative spondylolisthesis: intraobserver and interobserver reliability.
Bolesta MJ; Winslow L; Gill K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):1300-3. PubMed ID: 20512026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of lumbar lordosis. Evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability.
Polly DW; Kilkelly FX; McHale KA; Asplund LM; Mulligan M; Chang AS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jul; 21(13):1530-5; discussion 1535-6. PubMed ID: 8817780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of sacral morphology in developmental spondylolisthesis.
Wang Z; Parent S; Mac-Thiong JM; Petit Y; Labelle H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2185-91. PubMed ID: 18794760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Mok JM; Berven SH; Diab M; Hackbarth M; Hu SS; Deviren V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 18344863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.
Gstoettner M; Sekyra K; Walochnik N; Winter P; Wachter R; Bach CM
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1587-92. PubMed ID: 17549526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Precision of lumbar intervertebral measurements: does a computer-assisted technique improve reliability?
Pearson AM; Spratt KF; Genuario J; McGough W; Kosman K; Lurie J; Sengupta DK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(7):572-80. PubMed ID: 21217439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilty of measures of kyphosis in thoracolumbar fractures.
Street J; Lenehan B; Albietz J; Bishop P; Dvorak M; Fisher C;
Spine J; 2009 Jun; 9(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 19356989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
