These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2010440)
1. Femoro-popliteal and femoro-distal bypass: a comparison between in situ and reversed technique. Bergmark C; Johansson G; Olofsson P; Swedenborg J J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1991; 32(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 2010440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Semi-closed, ex-situ, non-reversed or reversed autogenous vein grafting. A technique for femoro-distal arterial bypass. Myers KA J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1991; 32(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 2010439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Long-term patency of reversed and in situ femoro-popliteal bypasses]. Marković DM; Davidović LB; Lotina SI; Kostić DM; Cinara IS; Svetković SD; Marković M; Zivanović N Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1999; 127(11-12):365-70. PubMed ID: 10686817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early experience utilizing the in situ saphenous vein technique in 54 patients. Strayhorn EC; Wohlgemuth S; Deuel M; Glickman MH; Hurwitz RL J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1988; 29(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 3360836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of graft type on patency of infrainguinal arterial bypass grafts. Neale ML; Graham JC; Lane RJ; Cheung DS; Appleberg M J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 8173726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [In situ femoro-popliteal bypass grafts. Study of 85 cases using Cartier's technique]. Chapleau D; Lassonde J; Blair JF; Laurendeau F Ann Chir; 1991; 45(9):751-5. PubMed ID: 1781615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Femoro-distal bypass for critical ischemia: is the use of prosthetic grafts justified? Harris PL; Campbell H Ann Vasc Surg; 1986 May; 1(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 3504692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Femoropopliteal bypass in arteriosclerosis]. Flørenes T; Zasada W; Bille S; Pillgram-Larsen J; Dedichen H Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Nov; 114(27):3193-4. PubMed ID: 7809873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The in situ bypass above the knee. Buchbinder D; Lloyd WE; Shah DM; Rollins DL; Semrow C; Leather RP Ann Vasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 3(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 2775634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative review of in situ versus reversed vein grafts in the 1980s. Calligaro KD; Friedell ML; Rollins DL; Semrow CM; Buchbinder D Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Mar; 172(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 1994504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In situ saphenous vein arterial bypass for infrainguinal revascularization: initial experience using an open technique. de Mello AV; Santos CM; Silva JL; Souza MT; Portilho MA; Guimarães AV; Freitas RG; Silvério JW Int Angiol; 1991; 10(3):126-32. PubMed ID: 1765713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Femoropopliteal bypass: saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Wooster DL; Provan JL; Sojka SG; Madras PN Can J Surg; 1982 Nov; 25(6):666-9. PubMed ID: 7139424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distal femoropopliteal bypass using a composite graft of PTFE and non-reversed saphenous vein. Holdsworth PJ; Riddell PS; Leveson SH Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1989 Jan; 71(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 2923418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Composite sequential grafts for femorocrural bypass reconstruction: experience with a modified technique. Mahmood A; Garnham A; Sintler M; Smith SR; Vohra RK; Simms MH J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):772-8. PubMed ID: 12368738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A retrospective analysis of infra-inguinal arterial reconstruction: three year patency rates. Brumby SA; Petrucco MF; Walsh JA; Bond MJ Aust N Z J Surg; 1992 Apr; 62(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 1550513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]