These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20104493)

  • 1. Measuring disability across cultures--the psychometric properties of the WHODAS II in older people from seven low- and middle-income countries. The 10/66 Dementia Research Group population-based survey.
    Sousa RM; Dewey ME; Acosta D; Jotheeswaran AT; Castro-Costa E; Ferri CP; Guerra M; Huang Y; Jacob KS; Rodriguez Pichardo JG; Garcia Ramírez N; Llibre Rodriguez J; Calvo Rodriguez M; Salas A; Sosa AL; Williams J; Prince MJ
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2010 Mar; 19(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 20104493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychometric properties of the world health organization disability assessment schedule II -12 Item (WHODAS II) in trauma patients.
    Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi M; Razi E; Sehat M; Asadi-Lari M
    Injury; 2016 May; 47(5):1104-8. PubMed ID: 26710706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in people with severe mental disorders in rural Ethiopia.
    Habtamu K; Alem A; Medhin G; Fekadu A; Dewey M; Prince M; Hanlon C
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):64. PubMed ID: 28381230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The 12 items Amharic version WHODAS-2 showed cultural adaptation and used to measure disability among road traffic trauma victims in Ethiopia.
    Denu ZA; Yassin MO; Bisetegn TA; Biks GA; Gelaye KA
    BMC Psychol; 2021 Jan; 9(1):1. PubMed ID: 33388086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule used in the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders.
    Buist-Bouwman MA; Ormel J; De Graaf R; Vilagut G; Alonso J; Van Sonderen E; Vollebergh WA;
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2008; 17(4):185-97. PubMed ID: 18792080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Activity limitation and participation restrictions of breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: psychometric properties and validation of the Chinese version of the WHODAS 2.0.
    Zhao HP; Liu Y; Li HL; Ma L; Zhang YJ; Wang J
    Qual Life Res; 2013 May; 22(4):897-906. PubMed ID: 22684528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disability in bipolar I disorder: the 36-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.
    Guilera G; Gómez-Benito J; Pino Ó; Rojo E; Vieta E; Cuesta MJ; Purdon SE; Bernardo M; Crespo-Facorro B; Franco M; Martínez-Arán A; Safont G; Tabarés-Seisdedos R; Rejas J;
    J Affect Disord; 2015 Mar; 174():353-60. PubMed ID: 25553398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II: contribution to the Italian validation.
    Federici S; Meloni F; Mancini A; Lauriola M; Olivetti Belardinelli M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(7):553-64. PubMed ID: 19191060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability - systematic review.
    Saltychev M; Katajapuu N; Bärlund E; Laimi K
    Disabil Rehabil; 2021 Mar; 43(6):789-794. PubMed ID: 31335215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the 36-item and 12-item self-report World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in individuals with autism spectrum disorder.
    Park SH; Demetriou EA; Pepper KL; Song YJC; Thomas EE; Hickie IB; Glozier N; Guastella AJ
    Autism Res; 2019 Jul; 12(7):1101-1111. PubMed ID: 31033250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychometric properties and validation of the polish version of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0.
    Ćwirlej-Sozańska A; Sozański B; Kotarski H; Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska A; Wiśniowska-Szurlej A
    BMC Public Health; 2020 Aug; 20(1):1203. PubMed ID: 32758211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement invariance of the 12-item self-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 across early and late adolescents in Canada.
    Ferro MA; Elgie M; Dol M; Basque D
    Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Sep; 45(19):3118-3124. PubMed ID: 36082846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the World Health Organization Assessment Schedule II Chinese Traditional Version (WHODAS II CT) in persons with disabilities and chronic illnesses for Chinese population.
    Cheung MK; Hung AT; Poon PK; Fong DY; Li LS; Chow ES; Qiu ZY; Liou TH
    Disabil Rehabil; 2015; 37(20):1902-7. PubMed ID: 25495681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0): development and validation of the Nigerian Igbo version in patients with chronic low back pain.
    Igwesi-Chidobe CN; Kitchen S; Sorinola IO; Godfrey EL
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Nov; 21(1):755. PubMed ID: 33203410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disability in bipolar I disorder: Application of Mokken scaling analysis and the graded response model to the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.
    Gómez-Benito J; Abdelhamid GSM; Pino O; Rojo E; Vieta E; Guilera G
    J Affect Disord; 2020 Jan; 260():506-513. PubMed ID: 31539687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Hebrew-speaking subjects with and without hand injury.
    Marom BS; Carel RS; Sharabi M; Ratzon NZ
    Disabil Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 39(12):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 27291062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why sample selection matters in exploratory factor analysis: implications for the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.
    Gaskin CJ; Lambert SD; Bowe SJ; Orellana L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):40. PubMed ID: 28283019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring functional health among the elderly: development of the Japanese version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II.
    Tazaki M; Yamaguchi T; Yatsunami M; Nakane Y
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2014 Mar; 37(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 24051962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functioning and disability analysis by using WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in older adults Taiwanese patients with dementia.
    Huang SW; Chang KH; Escorpizo R; Chi WC; Yen CF; Liao HF; Chang FH; Chiu WT; Lin JW; Liou TH
    Disabil Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 38(17):1652-63. PubMed ID: 26678282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confirmatory factor analysis of 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in patients with musculoskeletal pain conditions.
    Saltychev M; Mattie R; McCormick Z; Laimi K
    Clin Rehabil; 2017 May; 31(5):702-709. PubMed ID: 27260763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.