These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20105044)
1. The best insulin injection pen device for caregivers: results of injection trials using five insulin injection devices. Yakushiji F; Fujita H; Terayama Y; Yasuda M; Nagasawa K; Shimojo M; Taniguchi K; Fujiki K; Tomiyama J; Kinoshita H Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Feb; 12(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 20105044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Insulin pen needles: effects of extra-thin wall needle technology on preference, confidence, and other patient ratings. Aronson R; Gibney MA; Oza K; Bérubé J; Kassler-Taub K; Hirsch L Clin Ther; 2013 Jul; 35(7):923-933.e4. PubMed ID: 23790553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative device assessments: Humalog KwikPen compared with vial and syringe and FlexPen. Ignaut DA; Schwartz SL; Sarwat S; Murphy HL Diabetes Educ; 2009; 35(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 19783767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose accuracy and injection force dynamics of a novel disposable insulin pen. Clarke A; Spollett G Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2007 Mar; 4(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 17335413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient acceptance and issues of education of two durable insulin pen devices. Asakura T; Seino H; Jensen KH Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Aug; 10(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 18715204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose accuracy of SoloSTAR and FlexPen as assessed in a clinical setting. Friedrichs A Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Sep; 11(9):609-13. PubMed ID: 19764841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of usability and patient preference for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus Flexpen, lilly disposable pen, and a prototype pen: an open-label study. Haak T; Edelman S; Walter C; Lecointre B; Spollett G Clin Ther; 2007 Apr; 29(4):650-60. PubMed ID: 17617288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential Insulin Underdelivery from Prefilled and Reusable Insulin Pens in Cases of Premature Needle Withdrawal: A Laboratory Evaluation. Joubert M; Haddouche A; Morera J; Rod A; Reznik Y Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Oct; 17(10):712-6. PubMed ID: 26355757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Initiating insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: benefits of insulin analogs and insulin pens. Brunton S Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Aug; 10(4):247-56. PubMed ID: 18715198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose accuracy comparison between SoloSTAR and FlexPen at three different dose levels. Penfornis A; Horvat K Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Oct; 10(5):359-62. PubMed ID: 18715211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Insulin delivery with FlexPen: dose accuracy, patient preference and adherence. Pfützner A; Asakura T; Sommavilla B; Lee W Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2008 Aug; 5(8):915-25. PubMed ID: 18713000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ease of use and patient preference injection simulation study comparing two prefilled insulin pens. Clark PE; Valentine V; Bodie JN; Sarwat S Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Jul; 26(7):1745-53. PubMed ID: 20482243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of dose selection attributes with audible notification in insulin pen devices. Asakura T; Seino H Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Aug; 7(4):620-6. PubMed ID: 16120036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Injection force of SoloSTAR® compared with other disposable insulin pen devices at constant volume flow rates. van der Burg T J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 5(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 21303637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prefilled insulin pen with a novel injection mechanism and a lower injection force than other prefilled insulin pens. Hemmingsen H; Niemeyer M; Hansen MR; Bucher D; Thomsen NB Diabetes Technol Ther; 2011 Dec; 13(12):1207-11. PubMed ID: 21864019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Force requirements and insulin delivery profiles of four injection devices. Toraishi K; Yuizono Y; Nakamura N; Kato S; Aoki T; Ashida K; Sako Y Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Aug; 7(4):629-35. PubMed ID: 16120038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intuitiveness, instruction time, and patient acceptance of a prefilled insulin delivery device and a reusable insulin delivery device in a randomized, open-label, crossover handling study in patients with type 2 diabetes. Reimer T; Hohberg C; Pfützner AH; Jørgensen C; Jensen KH; Pfützner A Clin Ther; 2008 Dec; 30(12):2252-62. PubMed ID: 19167585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study on the dosing accuracy of commonly used disposable insulin pens. Krzywon M; van der Burg T; Fuhr U; Schubert-Zsilavecz M; Abdel-Tawab M Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Sep; 14(9):804-9. PubMed ID: 22694223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attributes Influencing Insulin Pen Preference Among Caregivers and Patients With Diabetes Who Require Greater Than 20 Units of Mealtime Insulin. Wang T; Conrad KA; van Brunt K; Rees TM J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 10(4):923-31. PubMed ID: 26920640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Engineering study comparing injection force and dose accuracy between two prefilled insulin injection pens. Ignaut DA; Opincar MR; Clark PE; Palaisa MK; Lenox SM Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Dec; 25(12):2829-33. PubMed ID: 19916727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]