These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20105090)
1. Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography. Förnvik D; Zackrisson S; Ljungberg O; Svahn T; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 20105090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging. Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens. Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Andersson I; Ikeda DM; Zackrisson S; Ruschin M; Svahn T; Timberg P; Tingberg A Eur Radiol; 2008 Dec; 18(12):2817-25. PubMed ID: 18641998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting. Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of diagnostic accuracy. Svahn TM; Chakraborty DP; Ikeda D; Zackrisson S; Do Y; Mattsson S; Andersson I Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):e1074-82. PubMed ID: 22674710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice. Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical experience of photon counting breast tomosynthesis: comparison with traditional mammography. Svane G; Azavedo E; Lindman K; Urech M; Nilsson J; Weber N; Lindqvist L; Ullberg C Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 21498340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In-plane visibility of lesions using breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography. Timberg P; Båth M; Andersson I; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Ruschin M Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5618-26. PubMed ID: 21158273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis--initial experiences. Tingberg A; Förnvik D; Mattsson S; Svahn T; Timberg P; Zackrisson S Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):180-3. PubMed ID: 21733859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy and recall rates for digital mammography and digital mammography combined with one-view and two-view tomosynthesis: results of an enriched reader study. Rafferty EA; Park JM; Philpotts LE; Poplack SP; Sumkin JH; Halpern EF; Niklason LT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):273-81. PubMed ID: 24450665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography. Durand MA; Haas BM; Yao X; Geisel JL; Raghu M; Hooley RJ; Horvath LJ; Philpotts LE Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 25188431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study. Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital breast tomosynthesis within a symptomatic "one-stop breast clinic" for characterization of subtle findings. Bansal GJ; Young P Br J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 88(1053):20140855. PubMed ID: 26133221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study. Svahn T; Andersson I; Chakraborty D; Svensson S; Ikeda D; Förnvik D; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Zackrisson S Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):113-7. PubMed ID: 20228048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Staging of breast cancer and the advanced applications of digital mammogram: what the physician needs to know? Helal MH; Mansour SM; Zaglol M; Salaleldin LA; Nada OM; Haggag MA Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160717. PubMed ID: 28055247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Overview of digital breast tomosynthesis: Clinical cases, benefits and disadvantages. Nguyen T; Levy G; Poncelet E; Le Thanh T; Prolongeau JF; Phalippou J; Massoni F; Laurent N Diagn Interv Imaging; 2015 Sep; 96(9):843-59. PubMed ID: 26275829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus mammography and breast ultrasound: a multireader performance study. Thibault F; Dromain C; Breucq C; Balleyguier CS; Malhaire C; Steyaert L; Tardivon A; Baldan E; Drevon H Eur Radiol; 2013 Sep; 23(9):2441-9. PubMed ID: 23673573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital tomosynthesis: a new future for breast imaging? Alakhras M; Bourne R; Rickard M; Ng KH; Pietrzyk M; Brennan PC Clin Radiol; 2013 May; 68(5):e225-36. PubMed ID: 23465326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]