These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20105092)

  • 21. Hybrid contrast-enhanced MR angiography of pelvic and lower extremity vasculature at 3.0 T: initial experience.
    Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Nijenhuis M; Hellmich M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 18243622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
    Mell M; Tefera G; Thornton F; Siepman D; Turnipseed W
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of auto-moving table contrast-enhanced 3-D MRA and iodinated contrast-enhanced DSA for evaluating the lower-extremity arteries.
    Ho CF; Wu MH; Wu HM; Chang CY; Chen MC; Chou TY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2004 Oct; 67(10):511-20. PubMed ID: 15648286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Critical lower-limb ischemia: the diagnostic performance of dual-phase injection MR angiography (including high-resolution distal imaging) compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Owen AR; Robertson IR; Annamalai G; Roditi GH; Edwards RD; Murray LS; Moss JG
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Feb; 20(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 19081736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: evaluation of a high spatial and temporal resolution 3-T MR protocol with a low total dose of gadolinium versus conventional angiography.
    Attenberger UI; Haneder S; Morelli JN; Diehl SJ; Schoenberg SO; Michaely HJ
    Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):879-87. PubMed ID: 20959539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. ECG-triggered non-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries in comparison to DSA in patients with peripheral artery occlusive disease.
    Partovi S; Rasmus M; Schulte AC; Rengier F; Jacob AL; Aschwanden M; Karmonik C; Bongartz G; Bilecen D
    MAGMA; 2013 Jun; 26(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 23117342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts.
    Froger CL; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Douwes-Draaijer P; Cuypers PW; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):284-91. PubMed ID: 15618386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multidetector row CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement.
    Romano M; Mainenti PP; Imbriaco M; Amato B; Markabaoui K; Tamburrini O; Salvatore M
    Eur J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 50(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 15145492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of aortoiliac and renal arteries: MR angiography with parallel acquisition versus conventional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Sutter R; Nanz D; Lutz AM; Pfammatter T; Seifert B; Struwe A; Heilmaier C; Weishaupt D; Marincek B; Willmann JK
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):276-84. PubMed ID: 17717331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
    Bui BT; Miller S; Mildenberger P; Sam A; Sheng R;
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1402-10. PubMed ID: 20512893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of critical limb ischemia in patients with diabetes: comparison of MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Lapeyre M; Kobeiter H; Desgranges P; Rahmouni A; Becquemin JP; Luciani A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Dec; 185(6):1641-50. PubMed ID: 16304027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of contrast-enhanced multi-station MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremity arterial disease.
    Burbelko M; Augsten M; Kalinowski MO; Heverhagen JT
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jun; 37(6):1427-35. PubMed ID: 23188773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
    Anzidei M; Napoli A; Marincola BC; Nofroni I; Geiger D; Zaccagna F; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):457-66. PubMed ID: 19401574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    van den Bosch HC; Westenberg JJ; Caris R; Duijm LE; Tielbeek AV; Cuypers PW; de Roos A
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):337-46. PubMed ID: 23143021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Whole-body MR angiography with body coil acquisition at 3 T in patients with peripheral arterial disease using the contrast agent gadofosveset trisodium.
    Nielsen YW; Eiberg JP; Løgager VB; Hansen MA; Schroeder TV; Thomsen HS
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Jun; 16(6):654-61. PubMed ID: 19297207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography to assess arterial inflow stenosis after kidney transplantation.
    Ferreiros J; Mendez R; Jorquera M; Gallego J; Lezana A; Prats D; Pedrosa CS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):751-7. PubMed ID: 10063875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. ECG-triggered non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography (TRANCE) versus digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease of the lower extremities.
    Gutzeit A; Sutter R; Froehlich JM; Roos JE; Sautter T; Schoch E; Giger B; Wyss M; Graf N; von Weymarn C; Jenelten R; Binkert CA; Hergan K
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Sep; 21(9):1979-87. PubMed ID: 21533632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Elgersma OE; Wüst AF; Buijs PC; van Der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
    Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 10924579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diagnosis of systemic arterial diseases with whole-body 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.
    Lin J; Chen B; Wang JH
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Nov; 119(21):1772-8. PubMed ID: 17097030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.