118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20105110)
1. Electric stimulation complements functional residual hearing in partial deafness.
Podskarbi-Fayette R; Pilka A; Skarzynski H
Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 130(8):888-96. PubMed ID: 20105110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
Fraysse B; Dillier N; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Morera Perez C; Morgon AH; Müller-Deile J; Ramos Macias A
Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Results from the first clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover.
Lenarz T; Stöver T; Buechner A; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Patrick J; Pesch J
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():22-31. PubMed ID: 19390172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new combined speech processor for electric and acoustic stimulation--eight months experience.
Helbig S; Baumann U; Helbig M; von Malsen-Waldkirch N; Gstoettner W
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2008; 70(6):359-65. PubMed ID: 18984971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array.
Helbig S; Van de Heyning P; Kiefer J; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Gstoettner W
Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 21281057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Results of partial deafness cochlear implantation using various electrode designs.
Skarzyński H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Podskarbi-Fayette R
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():39-45. PubMed ID: 19390174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ipsilateral electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of long-term hearing preservation.
Gstoettner WK; Helbig S; Maier N; Kiefer J; Radeloff A; Adunka OF
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():49-56. PubMed ID: 17063011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
Vermeire K; Anderson I; Flynn M; Van de Heyning P
Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade.
von Ilberg CA; Baumann U; Kiefer J; Tillein J; Adunka OF
Audiol Neurootol; 2011; 16 Suppl 2():1-30. PubMed ID: 21606646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Partial deafness cochlear implantation in children.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Anderson I
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1407-13. PubMed ID: 17597232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The influence of insertion depth on the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation].
Neumann M; Aschendorff A; Schipper J; Laszig R; Klenzner T
Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Feb; 84(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 15712047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hearing preservation after cochlear reimplantation.
Helbig S; Rajan GP; Stöver T; Lockley M; Kuthubutheen J; Green KM
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jan; 34(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 23202149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Partial deafness cochlear implantation provides benefit to a new population of individuals with hearing loss.
Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Anderson I
Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Sep; 126(9):934-40. PubMed ID: 16864490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the subjective benefit of electric acoustic stimulation with the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.
Gstoettner WK; Van de Heyning P; O'Connor AF; Kiefer J; Morera C; Sainz M; Vermeire K; McDonald S; Cavallé L; Valdecasas JG; Adunka OF; Baumann U; Kleine-Punte A; Brockmeier H; Anderson I; Helbig S
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011; 73(6):321-9. PubMed ID: 21997337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cochlear implantation: is hearing preservation necessary in severe to profound hearing loss?
Derinsu U; Serin GM; Akdaş F; Batman Ç
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):520-2. PubMed ID: 21403538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Central effects of residual hearing: implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation.
Francis HW; Yeagle JD; Brightwell T; Venick H
Laryngoscope; 2004 Oct; 114(10):1747-52. PubMed ID: 15454765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How much residual hearing is 'useful' for music perception with cochlear implants?
El Fata F; James CJ; Laborde ML; Fraysse B
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():14-21. PubMed ID: 19390171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The advantages of sound localization and speech perception of bilateral electric acoustic stimulation.
Moteki H; Kitoh R; Tsukada K; Iwasaki S; Nishio SY; Usami S
Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 Feb; 135(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 25423260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
