These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2010558)
1. The new drug approvals of 1987, 1988, and 1989: trends in drug development. Kaitin KI; DiCerbo PA; Lasagna L J Clin Pharmacol; 1991 Feb; 31(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 2010558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The new drug approvals of 1990, 1991, and 1992: trends in drug development. Kaitin KI; Manocchia M; Seibring M; Lasagna L J Clin Pharmacol; 1994 Feb; 34(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 8163711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends in drug development: the 1985-86 new drug approvals. Kaitin KI; Richard BW; Lasagna L J Clin Pharmacol; 1987 Aug; 27(8):542-8. PubMed ID: 3655005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The new drug approvals of 1993, 1994, and 1995: trends in drug development. Kaitin KI; Manocchia M Am J Ther; 1997 Jan; 4(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 10423591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A New Look At United States Drug Development and Approval Times. DiMasi JA Am J Ther; 1996 Sep; 3(9):647-657. PubMed ID: 11862306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. FDA advisory committees and the new drug approval process. Kaitin KI; Melville A; Morris B J Clin Pharmacol; 1989 Oct; 29(10):886-90. PubMed ID: 2592579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Therapeutic ratings and end-of-phase II conferences: initiatives to accelerate the availability of important new drugs. Kaitin KI; Phelan NR; Raiford D; Morris B J Clin Pharmacol; 1991 Jan; 31(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 2045524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Innovating by developing new uses of already-approved drugs: trends in the marketing approval of supplemental indications. DiMasi JA Clin Ther; 2013 Jun; 35(6):808-18. PubMed ID: 23726388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The rate of development of new drugs in the United States, 1963 through 1975. Wardell WM; Hassar M; Anavekar SN; Lasagna L Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1978 Aug; 24(2):133-45. PubMed ID: 679593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New drug development by United States pharmaceutical firms with analyses of trends in the acquisition and origin of drug candidates, 1963-1979. Wardell WM; May MS; Trimble AG Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1982 Oct; 32(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 7116754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FDA drug classification system. Sanborn MD; Godwin HN; Pessetto JD Am J Hosp Pharm; 1991 Dec; 48(12):2659-62. PubMed ID: 1814217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in the Review Period of Drug Application and a Drug Lag from the FDA and the EMA: An Industry Survey in South Korea Between 2011 and 2020. Choi H; Lee H; Park B; Kim C; Lee J Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2023 May; 57(3):552-560. PubMed ID: 36539577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The prescription Drug User Fee Act of 1992 and the new drug development process. Kaitin KI Am J Ther; 1997; 4(5-6):167-72. PubMed ID: 10423607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An appraisal of drug development timelines in the Era of precision oncology. Jardim DL; Schwaederle M; Hong DS; Kurzrock R Oncotarget; 2016 Aug; 7(33):53037-53046. PubMed ID: 27419632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigational drug tracking: phases I-III and NDA submissions--Part II. Grant KL Hosp Pharm; 1994 Oct; 29(10):900, 902-4, 906-11 passim. PubMed ID: 10137850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific and regulatory reasons for delay and denial of FDA approval of initial applications for new drugs, 2000-2012. Sacks LV; Shamsuddin HH; Yasinskaya YI; Bouri K; Lanthier ML; Sherman RE JAMA; 2014 Jan 22-29; 311(4):378-84. PubMed ID: 24449316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New drug development during and after a period of regulatory change: clinical research activity of major United States pharmaceutical firms, 1958 to 1979. May MS; Wardell WM; Lasagna L Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1983 Jun; 33(6):691-700. PubMed ID: 6851401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulatory review intervals for ophthalmic new drug applications at the US Food and Drug Administration. Novack GD Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 126(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 9683158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]