563 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20105678)
1. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection.
Kronström MH; Johnson GH; Hompesch RW
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20105678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials.
Wadhwani CP; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of the newly formulated vinyl siloxanether elastomeric impression material.
Stober T; Johnson GH; Schmitter M
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):228-39. PubMed ID: 20362766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surface quality and long-term dimensional stability of current elastomeric impression materials after disinfection.
Walker MP; Rondeau M; Petrie C; Tasca A; Williams K
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 17559536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
Breeding LC; Dixon DL
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Moisture effect on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction.
Walker MP; Petrie CS; Haj-Ali R; Spencer P; Dumas C; Williams K
J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 16336232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of disinfection on the dimensional stability of polyether impression materials.
Yilmaz H; Aydin C; Gul B; Yilmaz C; Semiz M
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 17760866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impression techniques and misfit-induced strains on implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study.
Cehreli MC; Akça K
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 16939020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of four different die materials before and after disinfection of the impression: an in vitro study.
Nandini Y; Vinitha KB; Manvi S; Smitha M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):668-74. PubMed ID: 24309347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of immersion disinfection procedures on dimensional stability of two elastomeric impression materials.
Melilli D; Rallo A; Cassaro A; Pizzo G
J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 50(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 19106472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
