These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20106905)

  • 1. A simple multiallele model and its application to identifying preferred-unpreferred codons using polymorphism data.
    Zeng K
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):1327-37. PubMed ID: 20106905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selection intensity on preferred codons correlates with overall codon usage bias in Caenorhabditis remanei.
    Cutter AD; Charlesworth B
    Curr Biol; 2006 Oct; 16(20):2053-7. PubMed ID: 17055986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mutation and selection at silent and replacement sites in the evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA.
    Rand DM; Kann LM
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):393-407. PubMed ID: 9720291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.
    Akashi H
    Genetics; 1995 Feb; 139(2):1067-76. PubMed ID: 7713409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nucleotide polymorphism in the RpII215 gene region of the insular species Drosophila guanche: reduced efficacy of weak selection on synonymous variation.
    Pérez JA; Munté A; Rozas J; Segarra C; Aguadé M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Nov; 20(11):1867-75. PubMed ID: 12885962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patterns of polymorphism and divergence from noncoding sequences of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: evidence for nonequilibrium processes.
    Kern AD; Begun DJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Jan; 22(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 15456897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic variability in sensitivity to population density affects the dynamics of simple ecological models.
    Doebeli M; de Jong G
    Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Feb; 55(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 9925807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Large-scale analyses of synonymous substitution rates can be sensitive to assumptions about the process of mutation.
    Aris-Brosou S; Bielawski JP
    Gene; 2006 Aug; 378():58-64. PubMed ID: 16797879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating selection intensity on synonymous codon usage in a nonequilibrium population.
    Zeng K; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2009 Oct; 183(2):651-62, 1SI-23SI. PubMed ID: 19620398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variation in synonymous codon use and DNA polymorphism within the Drosophila genome.
    Bierne N; Eyre-Walker A
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jan; 19(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16405571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards realistic codon models: among site variability and dependency of synonymous and non-synonymous rates.
    Mayrose I; Doron-Faigenboim A; Bacharach E; Pupko T
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i319-27. PubMed ID: 17646313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why are translationally sub-optimal synonymous codons used in Escherichia coli?
    Smith NG; Eyre-Walker A
    J Mol Evol; 2001 Sep; 53(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 11523009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Studying patterns of recent evolution at synonymous sites and intronic sites in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Zeng K; Charlesworth B
    J Mol Evol; 2010 Jan; 70(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 20041239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of strong directional selection on weakly selected mutations at linked sites: implication for synonymous codon usage.
    Kim Y
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Feb; 21(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 14660698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila.
    Akashi H; Kliman RM; Eyre-Walker A
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):49-60. PubMed ID: 9720271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. DNA sequence evolution: the sounds of silence.
    Sharp PM; Averof M; Lloyd AT; Matassi G; Peden JF
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1995 Sep; 349(1329):241-7. PubMed ID: 8577834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The mutation matrix and the evolution of evolvability.
    Jones AG; Arnold SJ; Bürger R
    Evolution; 2007 Apr; 61(4):727-45. PubMed ID: 17439608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intragenic Hill-Robertson interference influences selection intensity on synonymous mutations in Drosophila.
    Comeron JM; Guthrie TB
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2519-30. PubMed ID: 16120803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An empirical codon model for protein sequence evolution.
    Kosiol C; Holmes I; Goldman N
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jul; 24(7):1464-79. PubMed ID: 17400572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mutation-selection models of codon substitution and their use to estimate selective strengths on codon usage.
    Yang Z; Nielsen R
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 18178545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.