These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2010724)

  • 1. The effect of spacing repetitions on the recognition memory of young children and adults.
    Toppino TC; Kasserman JE; Mracek WA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1991 Feb; 51(1):123-38. PubMed ID: 2010724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The spacing effect in intentional and incidental free recall by children and adults: Limits on the automaticity hypothesis.
    Toppino TC; Fearnow-Kenney MD; Kiepert MH; Teremula AC
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):316-25. PubMed ID: 19246346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spacing and lag effects in free recall of pure lists.
    Kahana MJ; Howard MW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):159-64. PubMed ID: 15948289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The spacing effect in young children's free recall: support for automatic-process explanations.
    Toppino TC
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Mar; 19(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 2017039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spaced learning enhances subsequent recognition memory by reducing neural repetition suppression.
    Xue G; Mei L; Chen C; Lu ZL; Poldrack R; Dong Q
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jul; 23(7):1624-33. PubMed ID: 20617892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the retention of preschool and second-grade performers and observers under three verbalization conditions.
    Yussen SR; Santrock JW
    Child Dev; 1974 Sep; 45(3):821-4. PubMed ID: 4143837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Episodic context reinstatement promotes memory retention in older but not younger elementary schoolchildren.
    Ma X; Li T; Li Z; Zhou A
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2020 Jun; 38(2):304-318. PubMed ID: 31960469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spacing of repetitions improves learning and memory after moderate and severe TBI.
    Hillary FG; Schultheis MT; Challis BH; Millis SR; Carnevale GJ; Galshi T; DeLuca J
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Feb; 25(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 12607171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The emergence of strategic knowledge activation in categorical clustering during retrieval.
    Hasselhorn M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1990 Aug; 50(1):59-80. PubMed ID: 2398334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The differentiation hypothesis: distinguishing between perceiving and memorizing.
    Galbraith RC; Olsen SF; Duerden DS; Harris WL
    Am J Psychol; 1982; 95(4):655-67. PubMed ID: 7168457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binding, relational memory, and recall of naturalistic events: a developmental perspective.
    Sluzenski J; Newcombe NS; Kovacs SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 16478343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Instability of individual differences in the association between confidence judgments and memory performance.
    Thompson WB; Mason SE
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Mar; 24(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 8881325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: registration without learning?
    Hintzman DL; Curran T; Oppy B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Jul; 18(4):667-80. PubMed ID: 1385608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall.
    Hintzman DL; Caulton DA; Levitin DJ
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 9610117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developmental changes in memorial comparisons: the effects of stimulus presentation mode.
    Wright KP; Berch DB
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1992 Jun; 53(3):219-36. PubMed ID: 1613450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term spacing effect benefits in developmental amnesia: case experiments in rehabilitation.
    Green JL; Weston T; Wiseheart M; Rosenbaum RS
    Neuropsychology; 2014 Sep; 28(5):685-94. PubMed ID: 24749729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The development of the category-recall function under three retrieval conditions.
    Worden PE
    Child Dev; 1974 Dec; 45(4):1054-9. PubMed ID: 4143852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aging and memory for words and action events: effects of item repetition and list length.
    Cohen RL; Sandler SP; Schroeder K
    Psychol Aging; 1987 Sep; 2(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 3268220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Examining the contributions of desirable difficulty and reminding to the spacing effect.
    Maddox GB; Pyc MA; Kauffman ZS; Gatewood JD; Schonhoff AM
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1376-1388. PubMed ID: 30047090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do children "DRM" like adults? False memory production in children.
    Metzger RL; Warren AR; Shelton JT; Price J; Reed AW; Williams D
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Jan; 44(1):169-81. PubMed ID: 18194015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.