222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2010847)
21. Evolution during growth of the mechanical properties of the cortical bone in equine cannon-bones.
Bigot G; Bouzidi A; Rumelhart C; Martin-Rosset W
Med Eng Phys; 1996 Jan; 18(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 8771043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ability of ultrasound backscattering to predict mechanical properties of bovine trabecular bone.
Hakulinen MA; Töyräs J; Saarakkala S; Hirvonen J; Kröger H; Jurvelin JS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 30(7):919-27. PubMed ID: 15313324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Predictive value of Singh index and bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography in determining the local cancellous bone quality of the proximal femur.
Wachter NJ; Augat P; Hoellen IP; Krischak GD; Sarkar MR; Mentzel M; Kinzl L; Claes L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Mar; 16(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 11240062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Improved reproducibility of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography for measurement of bone quality.
MacNeil JA; Boyd SK
Med Eng Phys; 2008 Jul; 30(6):792-9. PubMed ID: 18164643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Spatial orientation in bone samples and Young's modulus.
Geraets WG; van Ruijven LJ; Verheij JG; van der Stelt PF; van Eijden TM
J Biomech; 2008 Jul; 41(10):2206-10. PubMed ID: 18539283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quantifying the regional variations in the mechanical properties of cancellous bone of the tibia using indentation testing and quantitative computed tomographic imaging.
Vijayakumar V; Quenneville CE
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jun; 230(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 27068841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of three-point bending test and peripheral quantitative computed tomography analysis in the evaluation of the strength of mouse femur and tibia.
Jämsä T; Jalovaara P; Peng Z; Väänänen HK; Tuukkanen J
Bone; 1998 Aug; 23(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 9701475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-dimensional characterization of cortical bone microstructure by microcomputed tomography: validation with ultrasonic and microscopic measurements.
Basillais A; Bensamoun S; Chappard C; Brunet-Imbault B; Lemineur G; Ilharreborde B; Ho Ba Tho MC; Benhamou CL
J Orthop Sci; 2007 Mar; 12(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 17393269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Nondestructive determination of iliac crest cancellous bone strength by pQCT.
Ebbesen EN; Thomsen JS; Mosekilde L
Bone; 1997 Dec; 21(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 9430244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mechanical properties, density and quantitative CT scan data of trabecular bone with and without metastases.
Kaneko TS; Bell JS; Pejcic MR; Tehranzadeh J; Keyak JH
J Biomech; 2004 Apr; 37(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 14996564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone.
Goulet RW; Goldstein SA; Ciarelli MJ; Kuhn JL; Brown MB; Feldkamp LA
J Biomech; 1994 Apr; 27(4):375-89. PubMed ID: 8188719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of three different preservation methods on the mechanical properties of human and bovine cortical bone.
Unger S; Blauth M; Schmoelz W
Bone; 2010 Dec; 47(6):1048-53. PubMed ID: 20736094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Correlation of mechanical properties of vertebral trabecular bone with equivalent mineral density as measured by computed tomography.
Lang SM; Moyle DD; Berg EW; Detorie N; Gilpin AT; Pappas NJ; Reynolds JC; Tkacik M; Waldron RL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1988 Dec; 70(10):1531-8. PubMed ID: 3198678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The influence of severe prolonged exercise restriction on the mechanical and structural properties of bone in an avian model.
Shipov A; Sharir A; Zelzer E; Milgram J; Monsonego-Ornan E; Shahar R
Vet J; 2010 Feb; 183(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 19135394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Correlation of mechanical properties within the equine third metacarpal with trabecular bending and multi-density micro-computed tomography data.
Leahy PD; Smith BS; Easton KL; Kawcak CE; Eickhoff JC; Shetye SS; Puttlitz CM
Bone; 2010 Apr; 46(4):1108-13. PubMed ID: 20079474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An improved method to assess torsional properties of rodent long bones.
Nazarian A; Entezari V; Vartanians V; Müller R; Snyder BD
J Biomech; 2009 Aug; 42(11):1720-5. PubMed ID: 19447390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The ability of quantitative ultrasound to predict the mechanical properties of trabecular bone under different strain rates.
Han S; Medige J; Faran K; Feng Z; Ziv I
Med Eng Phys; 1997 Dec; 19(8):742-7. PubMed ID: 9450259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Re: Determination of mechanical stiffness of bone by qPCT measurements: correlation with non-destructive mechanical four-point bending test data by Matrin et al., J. Biomech., 2004, Vol. 37, pp. 1289-1293.
Wang SJ
J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):381; author reply 381-2. PubMed ID: 16083889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Mechanical strength of tibial trabecular bone evaluated by X-ray computed tomography.
Bentzen SM; Hvid I; Jørgensen J
J Biomech; 1987; 20(8):743-52. PubMed ID: 3654673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Correlation of flexural structural properties with bone physical properties: a four species survey.
Ayers RA; Miller MR; Simske SJ; Norrdin RW
Biomed Sci Instrum; 1996; 32():251-60. PubMed ID: 8672676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
