BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2010901)

  • 1. Cervicography for evaluating the "atypical" Papanicolaou smear.
    August N
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Feb; 36(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 2010901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inflammatory atypia on cervical smears. A diagnostic dilemma for the gynecologist.
    Busseniers AE; Sidawy MK
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Feb; 36(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 2010900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
    Davis GL; Hernandez E; Davis JL; Miyazawa K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan; 69(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 3540762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
    Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The significance of moderate and severe inflammation on class I Papanicolaou smear.
    Lawley TB; Lee RB; Kapela R
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):997-9. PubMed ID: 2234731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear?
    Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Value of repeat cytology at the time of colposcopy for the evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on Papanicolaou smears.
    Wheelock JB; Kaminski PF
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):815-7. PubMed ID: 2795564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervicography: adjunctive cervical cancer screening by primary care clinicians.
    Ferris DG; Payne P; Frisch LE; Milner FH; diPaola FM; Petry LJ
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Aug; 37(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 8336097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of patients with atypical results of a Papanicolaou smear.
    Schauberger CW; Gundersen JH; Jensen DP; Felion PL; Merkitch KL
    Wis Med J; 1991 Oct; 90(10):577-80. PubMed ID: 1771918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The value of screening using cervicography in dysplasia and neoplasms of the uterine cervix].
    Coibion M; Guenier C; Miloiu A; Andry M; Bonnal JL; Nogaret JM
    Rev Med Brux; 1990; 11(1-2):16-20. PubMed ID: 2406832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Colposcopic evaluation of patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Talebian F; Shayan A; Krumholz BA; Palladino VS; Mann LI
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Jun; 49(6):670-4. PubMed ID: 865729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical screening with cervicography and the Papanicolaou smear in women with genital condylomata.
    Schauberger CW; Rowe N; Gundersen JH; Jensen DP; Chadbourn M
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Feb; 36(2):100-2. PubMed ID: 2010889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Colposcopic screening of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears.
    Kohan S; Noumoff J; Beckman EM; Morris M; Weiner E; Douglas GW
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 4009560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
    Economos K; Perez Veridiano N; Delke I; Collado ML; Tancer ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the Papanicolaou smear and the cervigram: sensitivity, specificity, and cost analysis.
    Tawa K; Forsythe A; Cove JK; Saltz A; Peters HW; Watring WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Feb; 71(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 3336558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Paired Papanicolaou smears in the evaluation of atypical squamous cells.
    Andrews S; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):747-50. PubMed ID: 2704501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High rates of atypical cervical cytology: occurrence and clinical significance.
    Pearlstone AC; Grigsby PW; Mutch DG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Aug; 80(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 1635730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
    Cheng RF; Hernandez E; Anderson LL; Heller PB; Shank R
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Nov; 44(11):922-8. PubMed ID: 10589401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.