144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20109083)
1. Prescribed real-ear and achieved real-life differences in children's hearing aids adjusted according to the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v.4.1 prescriptions.
Ching TY; Scollie SD; Dillon H; Seewald R; Britton L; Steinberg J
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S16-25. PubMed ID: 20109083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cross-over, double-blind comparison of the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children with mild to moderately severe hearing loss.
Ching TY; Scollie SD; Dillon H; Seewald R
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S4-15. PubMed ID: 20109088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v.4.1 prescriptions for children: Paired-comparison intelligibility judgments and functional performance ratings.
Ching TY; Scollie SD; Dillon H; Seewald R; Britton L; Steinberg J; Gilliver M; King KA
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S35-48. PubMed ID: 20109087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Children's speech perception and loudness ratings when fitted with hearing aids using the DSL v.4.1 and the NAL-NL1 prescriptions.
Scollie SD; Ching TY; Seewald RC; Dillon H; Britton L; Steinberg J; King K
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S26-34. PubMed ID: 20109085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the NAL-NL1 and DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children: Preference in real world use.
Scollie S; Ching TY; Seewald R; Dillon H; Britton L; Steinberg J; Corcoran J
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S49-63. PubMed ID: 20109089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of RECD transducer when deriving real-ear sound pressure level.
Munro KJ; Millward KE
Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):409-23. PubMed ID: 16825890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The national protocol for paediatric amplification in Australia.
King AM
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S64-9. PubMed ID: 19919326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hearing instrument fittings of pre-school children: do we meet the prescription goals?
Strauss S; van Dijk C
Int J Audiol; 2008; 47 Suppl 1():S62-71. PubMed ID: 18781516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of real-world preferences and performance of hearing aids fitted according to the NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 procedures in children with moderately severe to profound hearing loss.
Quar TK; Ching TY; Newall P; Sharma M
Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):322-32. PubMed ID: 23570290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of variations in hearing-aid frequency response on real-life functional performance of children with severe or profound hearing loss.
Ching TY; Hill M; Dillon H
Int J Audiol; 2008 Aug; 47(8):461-75. PubMed ID: 18698522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Psychophysical and Physical Measurements of Real Ear to Coupler Differences.
Koning R; Wouters J; Francart T
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):543-9. PubMed ID: 25822646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Foreword: The comparison of the effectiveness of NAL-NL1 and DSL[i/o] prescription procedures for children.
Dillon H
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S2. PubMed ID: 20109084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Different Hearing Aid Prescriptions for Children.
Marriage JE; Vickers DA; Baer T; Glasberg BR; Moore BCJ
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 28691934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptive methods for paediatric hearing-aid fitting: predicted speech intelligibility and loudness.
Ching TY; Johnson EE; Hou S; Dillon H; Zhang V; Burns L; van Buynder P; Wong A; Flynn C
Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52 Suppl 2(0 2):S29-38. PubMed ID: 24350692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fitting hearing aids to adults using prescriptive methods: an evidence-based review of effectiveness.
Mueller HG
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005; 16(7):448-60. PubMed ID: 16295232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Effects of Manufacturer's Prefit and Real-Ear Fitting on the Predicted Speech Perception of Children with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss.
Quar TK; Umat C; Chew YY
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):346-356. PubMed ID: 30461383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of real-ear to coupler difference values in the right and left ear of hearing aid users.
Munro KJ; Howlin EM
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):146-50. PubMed ID: 19745743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact on hearing aid targets of measuring thresholds in dB HL versus dB SPL.
Saunders GH; Morgan DE
Int J Audiol; 2003 Sep; 42(6):319-26. PubMed ID: 14570239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
