These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20110309)

  • 1. England's chlamydia screening programme is inefficient and fragmented, MPs say.
    Mooney H
    BMJ; 2010 Jan; 340():c539. PubMed ID: 20110309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. National chlamydia screening programme in England: making progress.
    Fenton KA; Ward H
    Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):331-3. PubMed ID: 15459397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Management of cases testing positive for gonococcal infection in a community-based chlamydia screening programme.
    Downing J; Cook PA; Madden HC; Phillips-Howard PA; Higgins SP; Bellis MA
    Sex Transm Infect; 2010 Nov; 86(6):474-7. PubMed ID: 20940161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. National screening programme for chlamydia exists in England.
    Fenton KA; LaMontagne DS; Randall S
    BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7458):172. PubMed ID: 15258085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening.
    LaMontagne DS; Fenton KA; Randall S; Anderson S; Carter P
    Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):335-41. PubMed ID: 15459399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guidelines for chlamydia screening made feasible by new tests.
    Golden WE; Gibson-Reed C; Wells C
    J Ark Med Soc; 2002 Nov; 99(5):152-3. PubMed ID: 12434624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chlamydia screening in young people fails to reduce prevalence.
    Mayor S
    BMJ; 2009 Nov; 339():b4736. PubMed ID: 19914952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The Dutch Health Council report on screening for Chlamydia: too reserved].
    Dekker JH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Apr; 149(16):850-2. PubMed ID: 15868986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Double standards in patient screening?
    Ages D
    Can Fam Physician; 1993 Feb; 39():244-5. PubMed ID: 8495111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementing a Chlamydia pilot screening programme.
    Gleave T
    Nurs Times; 2002 Dec 10-16; 98(50):34-7. PubMed ID: 12518550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. Screening for and treatment of chlamydial infection demand commitment.
    Opaneye AA
    BMJ; 1998 Sep; 317(7159):682. PubMed ID: 9758504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The chlamydia problem in New Zealand.
    Perkins N
    N Z Med J; 2004 May; 117(1194):U887. PubMed ID: 15156205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis?].
    Olesen F; Ostergaard LJ
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Aug; 159(34):5069. PubMed ID: 9283249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chlamydia trachomatis during pregnancy. To screen or not to screen?
    Carroll JC
    Can Fam Physician; 1993 Jan; 39():97-102. PubMed ID: 8435566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling the healthcare costs of an opportunistic chlamydia screening programme.
    Adams EJ; LaMontagne DS; Johnston AR; Pimenta JM; Fenton KA; Edmunds WJ
    Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):363-70. PubMed ID: 15459403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. NIAID chief of STD branch emphasizes importance of developing better diagnostic tests for STDs.
    AIDS Patient Care STDS; 1996 Oct; 10(5):317. PubMed ID: 11361543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population in Amsterdam. III. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women and the role of reinfection and partner treatment].
    Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; Jager JC; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Nov; 143(47):2383-5. PubMed ID: 10590778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening at-risk groups for Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Practitioner; 1989 Nov; 233(1479):1518. PubMed ID: 2622831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. New technologies enable screening to be carried out in schools and the community.
    Polaneczky M
    BMJ; 1998 Sep; 317(7159):681-2. PubMed ID: 9758503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chlamydia screening would pay dividends.
    Robinson A
    Practitioner; 1998 Oct; 242(1591):667. PubMed ID: 10343443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.