These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. Affymetrix in new patents row. Ledford H Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7203):377. PubMed ID: 18650873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Gene patent policy: does issuing gene patents accord with the purposes of the U.S. patent system? Bradshaw J Willamette Law Rev; 2001; 37(4):637-60. PubMed ID: 12774776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Geneticists question fees for use of patented 'junk' DNA. Dennis C Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):105. PubMed ID: 12736643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Science and the law. Working through the patent problem. Walsh JP; Cohen WM; Arora A Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5609):1021. PubMed ID: 12586928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Legal uncertainty in the area of genetic diagnostic testing. Huys I; Berthels N; Matthijs G; Van Overwalle G Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Oct; 27(10):903-9. PubMed ID: 19816443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Development and integration of molecular genetic tests into clinical practice: the US experience. Amos J; Grody W Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2004 Jul; 4(4):465-77. PubMed ID: 15225094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Genetics. Trends in human gene patent litigation. Holman CM Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):198-9. PubMed ID: 18845733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Statement from Peter Seeburg. Seeburg PH Nature; 1999 May; 399(6734):298. PubMed ID: 10360565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Patent rights and the free research. The boundary between basic research and private sector is not longer razor-sharp]. Westerlund L Lakartidningen; 2005 Sep 26-Oct 2; 102(39):2737. PubMed ID: 16245544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]