These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20111080)

  • 1. Assessing human sperm morphology: top models, underdogs or biometrics?
    Auger J
    Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 20111080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen.
    Menkveld R
    Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 20111081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semen analysis with regard to sperm number, sperm morphology and functional aspects.
    Eliasson R
    Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 20111078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extended semen examinations in the sixth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen: contributing to the understanding of the function of the male reproductive system.
    Baldi E; Gallagher MT; Krasnyak S; Kirkman-Brown J;
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Feb; 117(2):252-257. PubMed ID: 34986981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The sixth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen: ensuring quality and standardization in basic examination of human ejaculates.
    Björndahl L; Kirkman Brown J;
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Feb; 117(2):246-251. PubMed ID: 34986984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Another look at human sperm morphology.
    Auger J; Jouannet P; Eustache F
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 26472152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution of the WHO "Semen" processing manual from the first (1980) to the sixth edition (2021).
    Wang C; Mbizvo M; Festin MP; Björndahl L; Toskin I;
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Feb; 117(2):237-245. PubMed ID: 34996596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semen analysis and sperm function testing.
    Franken DR; Oehninger S
    Asian J Androl; 2012 Jan; 14(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 22179512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A comparative study of sperm morphology evaluation criteria by the fifth and fourth editions of WHO Laboratory Manual].
    Zhang XZ; Yao KS; Xiong CL
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2011 Nov; 17(11):989-92. PubMed ID: 22141268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cigarette Smoking and Semen Quality: A New Meta-analysis Examining the Effect of the 2010 World Health Organization Laboratory Methods for the Examination of Human Semen.
    Sharma R; Harlev A; Agarwal A; Esteves SC
    Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):635-645. PubMed ID: 27113031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sperm morphology classification: a rational method for schemes adopted by the world health organization.
    Rothmann SA; Bort AM; Quigley J; Pillow R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 927():27-37. PubMed ID: 22992901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Our experience in sperm morphology assessment.
    Ariagno JI; Curi SM; Chenlo P; Repetto HE; Pugliese MN; Palaoro LA; Sardi M; Mendeluk GR
    Asian J Androl; 2011 Mar; 13(2):201-2. PubMed ID: 21076434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sperm morphology assessment using strict (tygerberg) criteria.
    Menkveld R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 927():39-50. PubMed ID: 22992902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variability in the morphologic assessment of human sperm: use of the strict criteria recommended by the World Health Organization in 2010.
    Wang Y; Yang J; Jia Y; Xiong C; Meng T; Guan H; Xia W; Ding M; Yuchi M
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Apr; 101(4):945-9. PubMed ID: 24524830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Male infertility problems of patients with strict sperm morphology between 5-14% may be missed with the current WHO guidelines.
    Jensen CFS; Khan O; Nagras ZG; Sønksen J; Fode M; Østergren PB; Shah T; Ohl DA;
    Scand J Urol; 2018; 52(5-6):427-431. PubMed ID: 30602328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sperm Morphology: History, Challenges, and Impact on Natural and Assisted Fertility.
    Danis RB; Samplaski MK
    Curr Urol Rep; 2019 Jun; 20(8):43. PubMed ID: 31203470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Role of Sperm Morphology in Deciding Between Various Assisted Reproduction Technologies.
    Kohn TP; Kohn JR; Lamb DJ
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Apr; 4(3):311-313. PubMed ID: 30143470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Body mass index in relation to semen quality and reproductive hormones in New Zealand men: a cross-sectional study in fertility clinics.
    Macdonald AA; Stewart AW; Farquhar CM
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3178-87. PubMed ID: 24129611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen: its applicability to andrology laboratories in China].
    Lu JC; Huang YF; Lü NQ
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Oct; 16(10):867-71. PubMed ID: 21243747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Updates in protocol for human semen examination.].
    Sapozhkova ZY; Eremin KI
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2020; 65(2):106-110. PubMed ID: 32159308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.