316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20111081)
1. Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen.
Menkveld R
Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 20111081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The sixth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen: ensuring quality and standardization in basic examination of human ejaculates.
Björndahl L; Kirkman Brown J;
Fertil Steril; 2022 Feb; 117(2):246-251. PubMed ID: 34986984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Extended semen examinations in the sixth edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen: contributing to the understanding of the function of the male reproductive system.
Baldi E; Gallagher MT; Krasnyak S; Kirkman-Brown J;
Fertil Steril; 2022 Feb; 117(2):252-257. PubMed ID: 34986981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [A comparative study of sperm morphology evaluation criteria by the fifth and fourth editions of WHO Laboratory Manual].
Zhang XZ; Yao KS; Xiong CL
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2011 Nov; 17(11):989-92. PubMed ID: 22141268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evolution of the WHO "Semen" processing manual from the first (1980) to the sixth edition (2021).
Wang C; Mbizvo M; Festin MP; Björndahl L; Toskin I;
Fertil Steril; 2022 Feb; 117(2):237-245. PubMed ID: 34996596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do studies published in two leading reproduction journals between 2011 and 2020 demonstrate that they followed WHO5 recommendations for basic semen analysis?
Vasconcelos AL; Campbell MJ; Barratt CLR; Gellatly SA
Hum Reprod; 2022 Sep; 37(10):2255-2263. PubMed ID: 35947767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Our experience in sperm morphology assessment.
Ariagno JI; Curi SM; Chenlo P; Repetto HE; Pugliese MN; Palaoro LA; Sardi M; Mendeluk GR
Asian J Androl; 2011 Mar; 13(2):201-2. PubMed ID: 21076434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement and significance of sperm morphology.
Menkveld R; Holleboom CA; Rhemrev JP
Asian J Androl; 2011 Jan; 13(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 21076438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abnormal sperm count and motility on semen analysis are not sufficiently predictive of abnormal Kruger morphology.
Morelli SS; Seungdamrong A; McCulloh DH; McGovern PG
Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2882-4. PubMed ID: 20674904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertile and subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds.
Menkveld R; Wong WY; Lombard CJ; Wetzels AM; Thomas CM; Merkus HM; Steegers-Theunissen RP
Hum Reprod; 2001 Jun; 16(6):1165-71. PubMed ID: 11387287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen: its applicability to andrology laboratories in China].
Lu JC; Huang YF; Lü NQ
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Oct; 16(10):867-71. PubMed ID: 21243747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing human sperm morphology: top models, underdogs or biometrics?
Auger J
Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 20111080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of the normal sperm morphology value by Sperm Quality Analyzer IIC: comparison with the strict criteria.
Shibahara H; Suzuki T; Obara H; Hirano Y; Onagawa T; Taneichi A; Takamizawa S; Sato I
Int J Androl; 2002 Feb; 25(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 11869376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semen analysis with regard to sperm number, sperm morphology and functional aspects.
Eliasson R
Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 20111078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Semen analysis from an epidemiologic perspective.
Ellekilde Bonde JP
Asian J Androl; 2010 Jan; 12(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 20111087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Status of sperm morphology assessment: an evaluation of methodology and clinical value.
van den Hoven L; Hendriks JC; Verbeet JG; Westphal JR; Wetzels AM
Fertil Steril; 2015 Jan; 103(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 25450299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sperm morphology assessment using strict (tygerberg) criteria.
Menkveld R
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 927():39-50. PubMed ID: 22992902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Another look at human sperm morphology.
Auger J; Jouannet P; Eustache F
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 26472152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Male infertility problems of patients with strict sperm morphology between 5-14% may be missed with the current WHO guidelines.
Jensen CFS; Khan O; Nagras ZG; Sønksen J; Fode M; Østergren PB; Shah T; Ohl DA;
Scand J Urol; 2018; 52(5-6):427-431. PubMed ID: 30602328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Semen analysis and sperm function testing.
Franken DR; Oehninger S
Asian J Androl; 2012 Jan; 14(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 22179512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
