138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2011203)
1. Tort reform and access to obstetrical care. The Proposed North Carolina Birth Impairment Fund.
Fondren LK; Watterson MK; Ricketts TC
N C Med J; 1991 Feb; 52(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 2011203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Obstetric practice patterns in Washington state after tort reform: has the access problem been solved?
Rosenblatt RA; Whelan A; Hart LG
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):1105-10. PubMed ID: 2234722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changing patterns of obstetric practice in Washington State: the impact of tort reform.
Rosenblatt RA; Detering B
Fam Med; 1988; 20(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 3282957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The North Carolina obstetrics access and professional liability study: a rural-urban analysis.
Fondren LK; Ricketts TC
J Rural Health; 1993; 9(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 10126236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical professional liability and the delivery of obstetrical care.
Rostow VP; Osterweis M; Bulger RJ
N Engl J Med; 1989 Oct; 321(15):1057-60. PubMed ID: 2674719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical professional liability and the delivery of obstetrical care.
Bulger RJ; Rostow VP
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1990; 6():81-91. PubMed ID: 10105340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Birth-related neurological injury compensation funds: solution or stopgap?
Heland KV
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1992 Apr; 77(4):27-31. PubMed ID: 10170935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Beyond negligence: administrative compensation for adverse medical outcomes.
Strunk AL; Queenan JT
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 115(5):896-903. PubMed ID: 20410760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Throwing out the baby with the bathwater: reform in the system for compensating obstetric accidents.
Sieradzki DL
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1990 Aug; (138):7-34. PubMed ID: 10105860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. No-fault medical liability in Virginia and Florida. A preliminary evaluation.
Patel K
Eval Health Prof; 1995 Jun; 18(2):137-51. PubMed ID: 10143009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Virginia story: "no-fault" malpractice insurance.
Hosp Strategy Rep; 1990 Oct; 2(12):5-6. PubMed ID: 10107463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Neurologic birth injury. Protecting the legal rights of the child.
Conason RL; Pegalis SE
J Leg Med; 2010 Jul; 31(3):249-86. PubMed ID: 20830638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. No-fault cerebral palsy insurance: an alternative to the obstetrical malpractice lottery.
Freeman AD; Freeman JM
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1989; 14(4):707-18. PubMed ID: 2614041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cinderella: the story of HB1216.
Framme LH
Va Med; 1987 May; 114(5):284-90. PubMed ID: 3590944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The malpractice crisis in obstetrics.
Hosp Strategy Rep; 1990 Oct; 2(12):5. PubMed ID: 10107462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Tort reform recommendations for West Virginia.
Louda I; McColeman E; Ray R
W V Med J; 1990 Sep; 86(9):387-96. PubMed ID: 2238631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Helping nurse-midwives provide obstetrical care in rural North Carolina.
Taylor DH; Ricketts TC
Am J Public Health; 1993 Jun; 83(6):904-5. PubMed ID: 8498634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical liability, product liability, and the question of tort reform.
Ross-Lee B; Kiss L; Weiser MA
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1994 Dec; 94(12):1039-49. PubMed ID: 7852103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Legislation on birth-related injuries would address providers/victim problem.
Harrison CJ
Mich Hosp; 1989 Mar; 25(3):29-30. PubMed ID: 10292428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Charges for obstetric liability insurance and discontinuation of obstetric practice in New York.
Grumbach K; Vranizan K; Rennie D; Luft HS
J Fam Pract; 1997 Jan; 44(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 9010372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
