205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20112623)
1. Informed consent laws and the constitution: balancing state interests with a physician's first amendment rights and a woman's due process rights.
Runels S
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2009; 26(1):185-211. PubMed ID: 20112623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Physicians and the first amendment.
Kim HC
J Leg Med; 2010 Oct; 31(4):423-32. PubMed ID: 21184316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Physicians and the First Amendment.
Curfman GD; Morrissey S; Greene MF; Drazen JM
N Engl J Med; 2008 Dec; 359(23):2484-5. PubMed ID: 19020318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent and the First Amendment.
Mariner WK; Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2015 Apr; 372(14):1285-7. PubMed ID: 25830420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5.
Rosen JD
N Engl J Med; 2020 Sep; 383(12):1101-1103. PubMed ID: 32937044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. South Dakota's abortion script--threatening the physician-patient relationship.
Lazzarini Z
N Engl J Med; 2008 Nov; 359(21):2189-91. PubMed ID: 19020321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Stone AJ
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mazurek v. Armstrong: should states be allowed to restrict the performance of abortions to licensed physicians only?
Bazzelle RY
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):149-82. PubMed ID: 16200693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
Ehrlich JS
Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. How the doctor got gagged. The disintegrating right of privacy in the physician-patient relationship.
Sugarman J; Powers M
JAMA; 1991 Dec; 266(23):3323-7. PubMed ID: 1960832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Karlin v. Foust United States District Court western District of Wisconsin June 19, 1997.
Bostrom B
Issues Law Med; 1999; 14(4):377-88. PubMed ID: 10231999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Contemporary Australian abortion law: the description of a crime and the negation of a woman's right to abortion.
Rankin MJ
Monash Univ Law Rev; 2001; 27(2):229-52. PubMed ID: 16493805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bioethics discovers the Bill of Rights.
Veatch RM
Natl Forum; 1989; 69(4):11-3. PubMed ID: 16100834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The abortion arena: recent activity.
Goldstein LS; Comeau DJ
Leg Med; 1982; ():213-26. PubMed ID: 7121180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physically Intrusive Abortion Restrictions as Fourth Amendment Searches and Seizures: A new conceptual avenue for challenging abortion restrictions.
Harv Law Rev; 2015 Jan; 128(3):951-72. PubMed ID: 26793815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
Goldman EB
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. My body, my consent: securing the constitutional right to abortion funding.
McDonagh EL
Albany Law Rev; 1999; 62(3):1057-1118. PubMed ID: 10558501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of medical technology on the pregnant woman's right to privacy.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1987; 13(2-3):213-32. PubMed ID: 3333216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion laws in the states.
Oliver L
NCSL Legisbrief; 2004 Oct; 12(38):1-2. PubMed ID: 15499709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinic for Women, Inc. v. Brizzi.
Indiana. Court of Appeals
Wests North East Rep; 2004; 814():1042-60. PubMed ID: 16479700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
