These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20112623)
41. State regulatory efforts in protecting a surrogate's bodily autonomy. Williams A Seton Hall Law Rev; 2019; 49(1):205-31. PubMed ID: 30557923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases. Guggenheim M Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt. Harv Law Rev; 2016 Nov; 130(1):397-406. PubMed ID: 28117562 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The right to health care in the United States. Wing KR Ann Health Law; 1993; 2():161-93. PubMed ID: 10139965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Regulations passed by the board and/or amended during 2002. J Ark Med Soc; 2003 May; 99(11):349-53. PubMed ID: 12751408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions. Weissmann R Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The first amendment and physician speech in reproductive decision making. Suter SM J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 25846036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Family law I: abortion. Koscs ME Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Roe v. Wade and the common law: denying the blessings of liberty to our posterity. Roden GJ Univ West Los Angel Law Rev; 2003; 35():212-96. PubMed ID: 15568273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court. Bertz RC West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States. Belling DW; Eberl C J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 8666732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Rights, responsibilities and the power to negotiate. Ogrod ES Internist; 1991 Sep; 32(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 10113938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. State Restrictions on Mifepristone Access - The Case for Federal Preemption. Zettler PJ; Sarpatwari A N Engl J Med; 2022 Feb; 386(8):705-707. PubMed ID: 35020981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Health care law. Mayo TW SMU Law Rev; 2003; 56(3):1767-82. PubMed ID: 12924424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. A Thirteenth Amendment challenge to both racial disparities in medical treatment and improper physicians' informed consent disclosures. Pittman LJ St Louis Univ Law J; 2003; 48(1):131-89. PubMed ID: 17066559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Preterm Cleveland v. Voinovich. Ohio. Court of Appeals, Franklin County Wests North East Rep; 1993 Jul; 627():570-92. PubMed ID: 12041182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Race, religion, and informed consent--lessons from social science. Matthew DB J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(1):150-73, 4. PubMed ID: 18315768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Tucson Woman's Clinic v. Eden. United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Wests Fed Rep; 2004; 379():531-57. PubMed ID: 16477726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]