219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20113465)
1. Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers.
Hrynaszkiewicz I; Norton ML; Vickers AJ; Altman DG
Trials; 2010 Jan; 11():9. PubMed ID: 20113465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards agreement on best practice for publishing raw clinical trial data.
Hrynaszkiewicz I; Altman DG
Trials; 2009 Mar; 10():17. PubMed ID: 19296844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reporting of interventions in randomised trials: an audit of journal instructions to authors.
Hoffmann T; English T; Glasziou P
Trials; 2014 Jan; 15():20. PubMed ID: 24422788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Privacy and confidentiality in the publication of pedigrees: a survey of investigators and biomedical journals.
Botkin JR; McMahon WM; Smith KR; Nash JE
JAMA; 1998 Jun; 279(22):1808-12. PubMed ID: 9628712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033421. PubMed ID: 31767597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers.
Price A; Schroter S; Clarke M; McAneney H
BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e021753. PubMed ID: 30249629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the Quality of Abstracts in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in High Impact Cardiovascular Journals.
Khan MS; Shaikh A; Ochani RK; Akhtar T; Fatima K; Khan SU; Mookadam F; Murad MH; Figueredo VM; Doukky R; Krasuski RA
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2019 May; 12(5):e005260. PubMed ID: 31030545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medwaves editorial history, policies and guidelines: 2. Editorial policies.
Bachelet VC
Medwave; 2017 Apr; 17(3):e6909. PubMed ID: 28430770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.
Chauvin A; Ravaud P; Baron G; Barnes C; Boutron I
BMC Med; 2015 Jul; 13():158. PubMed ID: 26141137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethics in publication.
Wallace MB; Siersema PD
Endoscopy; 2015 Jul; 47(7):575-8. PubMed ID: 26099116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals.
Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors.
Schroter S; Tite L; Hutchings A; Black N
JAMA; 2006 Jan; 295(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 16418467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Authors' Submission Toolkit: a practical guide to getting your research published.
Chipperfield L; Citrome L; Clark J; David FS; Enck R; Evangelista M; Gonzalez J; Groves T; Magrann J; Mansi B; Miller C; Mooney LA; Murphy A; Shelton J; Walson PD; Weigel A
Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Aug; 26(8):1967-82. PubMed ID: 20569069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical considerations in anaesthesia journals.
Asai T; Shingu K
Anaesthesia; 1999 Feb; 54(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 10215719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survey of instructions to authors in Indian and British Dental Journals with respect to ethical guidelines.
Mathur VP; Dhillon JK; Kalra G; Sharma A; Mathur R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2013; 31(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 23886722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The management of errors and scientific fraud by biomedical journals: They cannot replace Institutions].
Maisonneuve H
Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):853-60. PubMed ID: 22836196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study.
Glonti K; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e020568. PubMed ID: 30341111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?
Al-Khatib A; Teixeira da Silva JA
Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Feb; 25(1):293-321. PubMed ID: 28905258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Integrity and misconduct in biomedical research].
Schonhaut B L
Rev Chil Pediatr; 2019 Apr; 90(2):217-221. PubMed ID: 31095239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
