210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20113465)
21. Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.
Carrell DT; Rajpert-De Meyts E
Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):531-2. PubMed ID: 23785017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Medwaves editorial history, policies and guidelines: 3. Section policies.
Bachelet VC
Medwave; 2017 Apr; 17(3):e6910. PubMed ID: 28430764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The role of editors, reviewers and authors in improving the journal quality.
Bugiardini R
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2011 Jan; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21263233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Nursing Journal Policies on Disclosure and Management of Conflicts of Interest.
Barnsteiner J; Shawn Kennedy M; Flanagin A; Sietmann C
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2020 Nov; 52(6):680-687. PubMed ID: 33078574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Declarations issued by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors in conjunction with the Vancouver standards].
Rev Panam Salud Publica; 1998 Apr; 3(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 9608815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.
Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):231-50. PubMed ID: 23538175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Endorsement for improving the quality of reports on randomized controlled trials of traditional medicine journals in Korea: a systematic review.
Choi J; Jun JH; Kang BK; Kim KH; Lee MS
Trials; 2014 Nov; 15():429. PubMed ID: 25373427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Peer-review policy and guidelines for Biochemia Medica Journal.
Smolčić VŠ; Simundić AM
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2014; 24(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 25351350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation criteria for publishing in top-tier journals in environmental health sciences and toxicology.
Lee BM
Environ Health Perspect; 2011 Jul; 119(7):896-9. PubMed ID: 21414890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Peer review of human studies run amok: a break in the fiduciary relation between scientists and the public.
Feldstein Ewing SW; Saitz R
Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 20(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 25121564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals.
Flanagin A; Carey LA; Fontanarosa PB; Phillips SG; Pace BP; Lundberg GD; Rennie D
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 9676661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Authors' and editors' perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals.
Shattell MM; Chinn P; Thomas SP; Cowling WR
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Mar; 42(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 20487187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Challenges for publishing Brazilian scientific health journals.
Barata RB
Cien Saude Colet; 2019 Mar; 24(3):929-939. PubMed ID: 30892514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Medical Journal of Australia Internet peer-review study.
Bingham CM; Higgins G; Coleman R; Van Der Weyden MB
Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9126):441-5. PubMed ID: 9708752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Peer review: a view based on recent experience as an author and reviewer.
Clark RK
Br Dent J; 2012 Aug; 213(4):153-4. PubMed ID: 22918342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Journal editors' perspectives on the communication practices in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e035600. PubMed ID: 32792429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prevalence of honorary coauthorship in the American Journal of Roentgenology.
Bonekamp S; Halappa VG; Corona-Villalobos CP; Mensa M; Eng J; Lewin JS; Kamel IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jun; 198(6):1247-55. PubMed ID: 22623536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines.
Claxton LD
Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15652225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.
Galipeau J; Barbour V; Baskin P; Bell-Syer S; Cobey K; Cumpston M; Deeks J; Garner P; MacLehose H; Shamseer L; Straus S; Tugwell P; Wager E; Winker M; Moher D
BMC Med; 2016 Feb; 14():16. PubMed ID: 26837937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ethical issues in biomedical publications.
Kempers RD
Fertil Steril; 2002 May; 77(5):883-8. PubMed ID: 12009339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
