These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20113795)

  • 1. An in vitro comparison of Profile GT and GTX nickel-titanium rotary instruments in apical transportation and length control in mandibular molar.
    Iqbal MK; Floratos S; Hsu YK; Karabucak B
    J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):302-4. PubMed ID: 20113795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of apical transportation in four Ni-Ti rotary instrumentation techniques.
    Iqbal MK; Maggiore F; Suh B; Edwards KR; Kang J; Kim S
    J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):587-91. PubMed ID: 14503833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and RaCe rotary instruments.
    García M; Duran-Sindreu F; Mercadé M; Bueno R; Roig M
    J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):990-2. PubMed ID: 22703667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of 6 rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Celik D; Taşdemir T; Er K
    J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23321246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of apical transportation between FlexMaster and Twisted Files rotary instruments.
    Duran-Sindreu F; García M; Olivieri JG; Mercadé M; Morelló S; Roig M
    J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):993-5. PubMed ID: 22703668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Iqbal MK; Firic S; Tulcan J; Karabucak B; Kim S
    Int Endod J; 2004 Jun; 37(6):359-64. PubMed ID: 15186241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals.
    D'Amario M; Baldi M; Petricca R; De Angelis F; El Abed R; D'Arcangelo C
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1581-4. PubMed ID: 24238451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing apical preparations of root canals shaped by nickel-titanium rotary instruments and nickel-titanium hand instruments.
    Deplazes P; Peters O; Barbakow F
    J Endod; 2001 Mar; 27(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 11487151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
    Javaheri HH; Javaheri GH
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 17320715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography.
    Paqué F; Ganahl D; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1056-9. PubMed ID: 19567334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators.
    Gluskin AH; Brown DC; Buchanan LS
    Int Endod J; 2001 Sep; 34(6):476-84. PubMed ID: 11556516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability of rotary ProTaper compared with rotary GT and manual K-Flexofile.
    Liu SB; Fan B; Cheung GS; Peng B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Song YL; Fu Q; Bian Z
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 17212077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of apical transportation between two rotary file systems and two hybrid rotary instrumentation sequences.
    Setzer FC; Kwon TK; Karabucak B
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1226-9. PubMed ID: 20630304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems.
    Hashem AA; Ghoneim AG; Lutfy RA; Foda MY; Omar GA
    J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):996-1000. PubMed ID: 22703669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of LightSpeed LS1 and LightSpeed LSX NiTi rotary instruments in apical transportation and length control in simulated root canals.
    Iqbal MK; Banfield B; Lavorini A; Bachstein B
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):268-71. PubMed ID: 17320711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Apical transportation associated with ProTaper Universal F1, F2 and F3 instruments in curved canals prepared by undergraduate students.
    Brito-Júnior M; Faria-E-Silva AL; Camilo CC; Pereira RD; Braga NM; Sousa-Neto MD
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2014 Apr; 22(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 24676579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rotary nickel-titanium GT and ProTaper files for root canal shaping by novice operators: a radiographic and micro-computed tomography evaluation.
    Gekelman D; Ramamurthy R; Mirfarsi S; Paqué F; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19840653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
    Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
    J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.