These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20116266)
1. Testing Monte Carlo computer codes for simulations of electron transport in matter. Sídlová V; Trojek T Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):961-4. PubMed ID: 20116266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uncertainties beyond statistics in Monte Carlo simulations. Hughes HG Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):45-51. PubMed ID: 17766264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Doppler broadening effect on low-energy photon dose calculations using MCNP5 and PENELOPE. Ye SJ; Ove R; Naqvi SA Health Phys; 2006 Oct; 91(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 16966879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation transport calculations for 50 MV photon therapy beam using the Monte Carlo code GEANT4. Larsson S; Svensson R; Gudowska I; Ivanchenko V; Brahme A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):503-7. PubMed ID: 16381775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo modelling of energy deposition in trabecular bone. Gersh JA; Dingfelder M; Toburen LH Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):549-50. PubMed ID: 17132659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of electron dose-point kernels in water generated by the Monte Carlo codes, PENELOPE, GEANT4, MCNPX, and ETRAN. Uusijärvi H; Chouin N; Bernhardt P; Ferrer L; Bardiès M; Forssell-Aronsson E Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2009 Aug; 24(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 19694581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electron beam transport in heterogeneous slab media from MeV down to eV. Yousfi M; Leger J; Loiseau JF; Held B; Eichwald O; Defoort B; Dupillier JM Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):46-52. PubMed ID: 17151011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Energy-loss straggling algorithms for Monte Carlo electron transport. Chibani O Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2374-83. PubMed ID: 12408312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benchmark of penelope for low and medium energy X-rays. Chica U; Anguiano M; Lallena AM Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 18495512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electron track simulation using ETMICRO. Kim EH Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):53-5. PubMed ID: 17182606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of transverse magnetic fields on dose distribution and RBE of photon beams: comparing PENELOPE and EGS4 Monte Carlo codes. Nettelbeck H; Takacs GJ; Rosenfeld AB Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):5123-37. PubMed ID: 18723929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simulation of photon energy spectra from Varian 2100C and 2300C/D Linacs: simplified estimates with PENELOPE Monte Carlo models. Baumgartner A; Steurer A; Maringer FJ Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Nov; 67(11):2007-12. PubMed ID: 19692253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MANTIS: combined x-ray, electron and optical Monte Carlo simulations of indirect radiation imaging systems. Badano A; Sempau J Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1545-61. PubMed ID: 16510962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of deterministic and Monte Carlo methods in shielding design. Oliveira AD; Oliveira C Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):254-7. PubMed ID: 16381723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of PENELOPE Monte Carlo dose calculations with Fricke dosimeter and ionization chamber measurements in heterogeneous phantoms (18 MeV electron and 12 MV photon beams). Blazy L; Baltes D; Bordy JM; Cutarella D; Delaunay F; Gouriou J; Leroy E; Ostrowsky A; Beaumont S Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5951-65. PubMed ID: 17068376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Re-evaluation of absorbed fractions for photons and electrons in spheres of various sizes. Stabin MG; Konijnenberg MW J Nucl Med; 2000 Jan; 41(1):149-60. PubMed ID: 10647618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of the multiple scattering of electrons in Monte Carlo simulation of LINACS. Vilches M; García-Pareja S; Guerrero R; Anguiano M; Lallena AM Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 18086502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo feasibility study of orthogonal bremsstrahlung beams for improved radiation therapy imaging. Jabbari K; Sarfehnia A; Podgorsak EB; Seuntjens JP Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):1171-84. PubMed ID: 17264378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Calculation of photon energy deposition kernels and electron dose point kernels in water. Mainegra-Hing E; Rogers DW; Kawrakow I Med Phys; 2005 Mar; 32(3):685-99. PubMed ID: 15839340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calibration of EPR signal dose response of tooth enamel to photons: experiment and Monte Carlo simulation. Ivannikov AI; Tikunov DD; Borysheva NB; Trompier F; Skvortsov VG; Stepanenko VF; Hoshi M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(4):303-15. PubMed ID: 15103060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]