These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20116781)

  • 1. Effects of carrying methods and box handles on two-person team carrying capacity for females.
    Wu SP; Chang SY
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):615-9. PubMed ID: 20116781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychophysical determination of load carrying capacity for a 1-h work period by Chinese males.
    Wu SP; Chen CC
    Ergonomics; 2001 Sep; 44(11):1008-23. PubMed ID: 11693245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of box handle position and carrying range on bi-manual carrying capacity for females.
    Wu SP; Loiu Y; Chien TH
    Ind Health; 2015; 53(5):410-6. PubMed ID: 26212410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximum acceptable weight of manual load carriage for young Taiwanese males.
    Cheng TS; Lee TH
    Ind Health; 2006 Jan; 44(1):200-6. PubMed ID: 16610560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of carrying handles, postures, materials and distances on carrying capability.
    Lee TH; Yeh YC
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2015; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 26647947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychophysically acceptable weights for a combination lifting task using bags with handles.
    Fredericks TK; Fernandez JE; Rodrigues CC
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1994 Dec; 23(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 7730595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Snook SH; Ciriello VM
    Ergonomics; 1991 Sep; 34(9):1197-213. PubMed ID: 1743178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Further studies of psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces.
    Ciriello VM; Snook SH; Hughes GJ
    Hum Factors; 1993 Mar; 35(1):175-86. PubMed ID: 8509102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physiological and psychophysical responses in handling maximum acceptable weights under different footwear--floor friction conditions.
    Li KW; Yu RF; Han XL
    Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 17010302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rating of acceptable load in manual sorting of postal parcels.
    Stålhammar HR; Louhevaara V; Troup JD
    Ergonomics; 1996 Oct; 39(10):1214-20. PubMed ID: 8876080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Symmetric and asymmetric manual materials handling. Part 1: Physiology and psychophysics.
    Drury CG; Deeb JM; Hartman B; Woolley S; Drury CE; Gallagher S
    Ergonomics; 1989 May; 32(5):467-89. PubMed ID: 2767042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the sensitivity of three psychophysical techniques to three manual materials handling task variables.
    Kumar S; Narayan Y; Bjornsdottir S
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 9973872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A manual materials handling study of bag lifting.
    Smith JL; Jiang BC
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Aug; 45(8):505-8. PubMed ID: 6475757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shrinkage and psychophysical load ratings in self-paced and force-paced lifting work and during recovery.
    Stålhammar HR; Leskinen TP; Rautanen MT; Troup JD
    Ergonomics; 1992 Jan; 35(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1544359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of a simulated versus work environment lifting task on L5/S1 compression forces.
    Surrey LR; Fineran B; Howerton B; Mock A; Naylor D; Wiegand-Swihart T
    Work; 2003; 21(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 14600331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects.
    Lee YH; Wu SP; Hsu SH
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 7729395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of container size, frequency and extended horizontal reach on maximum acceptable weights of lifting for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    Appl Ergon; 2007 Jan; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16616883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discriminability of load heaviness: implications for the psychophysical approach to manual lifting.
    Karwowski W; Shumate C; Yates JW; Pongpatana N
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):729-44. PubMed ID: 1633786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of risk assessment of single and combination manual handling tasks: 2. Discomfort, rating of perceived exertion and heart rate measures.
    Straker LM; Stevenson MG; Twomey LT
    Ergonomics; 1997 Jun; 40(6):656-69. PubMed ID: 9174417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.