These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20117303)

  • 41. [Biomechanical study of flexor tendon and finger motor function].
    Zhang Z; Xiong Y
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 26(6):1267-70. PubMed ID: 20095484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Remodeling of the gliding surface after flexor tendon repair in a canine model in vivo.
    Zhao C; Amadio PC; Momose T; Zobitz ME; Couvreur P; An KN
    J Orthop Res; 2002 Jul; 20(4):857-62. PubMed ID: 12168678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of partial versus complete circumferential repair on flexor tendon strength in cadavers.
    Ansari U; Lawson RD; Peterson JL; Appleyard RC; Tonkin MA
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Dec; 34(10):1771-6. PubMed ID: 19969187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effects of A1 pulley release after flexor tendon repair in a cadaveric model.
    Buonocore SD; Broer PN; Kaldany A; Sawh-Martinez R; Thomson JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Oct; 130(4):857-864. PubMed ID: 22691846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of superficialis tendon repairs on lacerated profundus tendons within or proximal to the A2 pulley: an in vivo study in chickens.
    Xu Y; Tang JB
    J Hand Surg Am; 2003 Nov; 28(6):994-1001. PubMed ID: 14642516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Management of Partial Zone II Intrasynovial Flexor Tendon Lacerations: A Literature Review of Biomechanics, Clinical Outcomes, and Complications.
    Lineberry KD; Shue S; Chepla KJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):1165-1170. PubMed ID: 29351182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Investigation of locking configurations for tendon repair.
    Xie RG; Tang JB
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 May; 30(3):461-5. PubMed ID: 15925152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effect of partial A2 pulley excision on gliding resistance and pulley strength in vitro.
    Tanaka T; Amadio PC; Zhao C; Zobitz ME; An KN
    J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Sep; 29(5):877-83. PubMed ID: 15465238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of A3 pulley and adjacent sheath integrity on tendon excursion and bowstringing.
    Tang JB; Xie RG
    J Hand Surg Am; 2001 Sep; 26(5):855-61. PubMed ID: 11561238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of triggering and entrapment on tendon gliding properties following digital flexor tendon laceration: in vitro study on turkey tendon.
    Kennedy JA; Dias JJ
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2014 Sep; 39(7):708-13. PubMed ID: 23735810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Biomechanical study of cross-locked cruciate versus Strickland flexor tendon repair.
    Vigler M; Palti R; Goldstein R; Patel VP; Nasser P; Lee SK
    J Hand Surg Am; 2008 Dec; 33(10):1826-33. PubMed ID: 19084186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Quantification of partial or complete A4 pulley release with FDP repair in cadaveric tendons.
    Franko OI; Lee NM; Finneran JJ; Shillito MC; Meunier MJ; Abrams RA; Lieber RL
    J Hand Surg Am; 2011 Mar; 36(3):439-45. PubMed ID: 21306835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. In vitro biomechanical analysis of suture methods for flexor tendon repair.
    Noguchi M; Seiler JG; Gelberman RH; Sofranko RA; Woo SL
    J Orthop Res; 1993 Jul; 11(4):603-11. PubMed ID: 8340832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Biomechanical analysis of the cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repair.
    McLarney E; Hoffman H; Wolfe SW
    J Hand Surg Am; 1999 Mar; 24(2):295-301. PubMed ID: 10194013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Repair strength of tendons of varying gliding curvature: a study in a curvilinear model.
    Tang JB; Xu Y; Wang B
    J Hand Surg Am; 2003 Mar; 28(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 12671855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of tension direction on strength of tendon repair.
    Tang JB; Cao Y; Xie RG
    J Hand Surg Am; 2001 Nov; 26(6):1105-10. PubMed ID: 11721259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Flexor tendon repair in zone II with 6-strand techniques and early active mobilization.
    Osada D; Fujita S; Tamai K; Yamaguchi T; Iwamoto A; Saotome K
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006; 31(6):987-92. PubMed ID: 16843161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of flexor tendon repair bulk on tendon gliding during simulated active motion: an in vitro comparison of two-strand and six-strand techniques.
    Sanders DW; Milne AD; Johnson JA; Dunning CE; Richards RS; King GJ
    J Hand Surg Am; 2001 Sep; 26(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 11561235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The gliding force and work of flexion in the early days after primary repair of lacerated flexor tendons: an experimental study.
    Xie RG; Cao Y; Xu XF; Zhu B
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2008 Apr; 33(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 18443062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An analysis of factors associated with failure of tendon repair in the canine model.
    Zhao C; Moran SL; Cha SS; Kai-Nan-An ; Amadio PC
    J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Apr; 32(4):518-25. PubMed ID: 17398363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.