These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20117528)

  • 1. Regarding "Abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter: a comparison of ultrasound measurements with those from standard and three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction".
    Dalainas I; Avgerinos ED
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Jan; 51(1):287; author reply 287-8. PubMed ID: 20117528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Bredahl K; Sandholt B; Lönn L; Rouet L; Ardon R; Eiberg JP; Sillesen H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2015 Mar; 49(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 25662155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional workstation is useful for measuring the correct size of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameters.
    Ihara T; Komori K; Yamamoto K; Kobayashi M; Banno H; Kodama A
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2013 Feb; 27(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 22951061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter: a comparison of ultrasound measurements with those from standard and three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction.
    Manning BJ; Kristmundsson T; Sonesson B; Resch T
    J Vasc Surg; 2009 Aug; 50(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 19631858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond fusiform and saccular: a novel quantitative tortuosity index may help classify aneurysm shape and predict aneurysm rupture potential.
    Pappu S; Dardik A; Tagare H; Gusberg RJ
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2008 Jan; 22(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 18023556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of a new standardized method to measure proximal aneurysm neck angulation.
    van Keulen JW; Moll FL; Tolenaar JL; Verhagen HJ; van Herwaarden JA
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Apr; 51(4):821-8. PubMed ID: 20347677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Commentary: DynaCT and its use in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    van Keulen JW; Moll FL; Verhagen HJ; van Herwaarden JA
    J Endovasc Ther; 2010 Apr; 17(2):190-1. PubMed ID: 20426635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrepancies in determination of abdominal aortic aneurysms maximum diameter and growth rate, using axial and orhtogonal computed tomography measurements.
    Kontopodis N; Metaxa E; Gionis M; Papaharilaou Y; Ioannou CV
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1398-403. PubMed ID: 23727377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasound-determined diameter measurements are more accurate than axial computed tomography after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
    Han SM; Patel K; Rowe VL; Perese S; Bond A; Weaver FA
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Jun; 51(6):1381-7; discussion 1387-9. PubMed ID: 20488320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regarding "Impact of calcification and intraluminal thrombus on the computed wall stresses of abdominal aortic aneurysm".
    Georgakarakos E; Ioannou CV; Kostas T; Katsamouris AN; Kamarianakis Y
    J Vasc Surg; 2009 Aug; 50(2):474; author reply 474-5. PubMed ID: 19631896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting patient-specific expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Helderman F; Manoch IJ; Breeuwer M; Kose U; Boersma H; van Sambeek MR; Pattynama PM; Schouten O; Poldermans D; Wisselink W; van der Steen AF; Krams R
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 40(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 20346709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening and ultrasound surveillance of large abdominal aortic aneurysms do not improve suitability for endovascular repair.
    Thompson AR; Rodway A; Mitchell A; Hafez H
    J Vasc Surg; 2006 Feb; 43(2):265-9; discussion 269. PubMed ID: 16476598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Imaging of the endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair procedure by using multidetector computer tomography angiography.
    Saba L; Montisci R; Sanfilippo R; Mallarini G
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2009 Aug; 50(4):515-26. PubMed ID: 19734835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional imaging core laboratory of the endovascular aneurysm repair trials: validation of methodology.
    Wyss TR; Dick F; England A; Brown LC; Rodway AD; Greenhalgh RM
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2009 Dec; 38(6):724-31. PubMed ID: 19828337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of electrocardiographic-gated 4-dimensional CT to assess patency of abdominal aortic branch vessels in type B dissection.
    Bolen MA; Mastracci TM; Schoenhagen P
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(6):415-6. PubMed ID: 20083063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of model assumptions on results of computational mechanics in abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Reeps C; Gee M; Maier A; Gurdan M; Eckstein HH; Wall WA
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Mar; 51(3):679-88. PubMed ID: 20206812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of dynamic computed tomographic angiography on endograft sizing for endovascular aneurysm repair.
    Pol JA; Truijers M; van der Vliet JA; Fillinger MF; Marra SP; Renema WK; Oostveen LJ; Kool LJ; Blankensteijn JD
    J Endovasc Ther; 2009 Oct; 16(5):546-51. PubMed ID: 19842723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus color duplex ultrasound imaging in the follow-up of patients after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
    Iezzi R; Basilico R; Giancristofaro D; Pascali D; Cotroneo AR; Storto ML
    J Vasc Surg; 2009 Mar; 49(3):552-60. PubMed ID: 19135839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What imaging studies are necessary for abdominal aortic endograft sizing? A prospective blinded study using conventional computed tomography, aortography, and three-dimensional computed tomography.
    Parker MV; O'Donnell SD; Chang AS; Johnson CA; Gillespie DL; Goff JM; Rasmussen TE; Rich NM
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 Feb; 41(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 15767998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of geometric parameters in the prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress.
    Georgakarakos E; Ioannou CV; Kamarianakis Y; Papaharilaou Y; Kostas T; Manousaki E; Katsamouris AN
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Jan; 39(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 19906549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.