BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20117566)

  • 1. Intervention to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers a systematic review of provider reminders.
    Baron RC; Melillo S; Rimer BK; Coates RJ; Kerner J; Habarta N; Chattopadhyay S; Sabatino SA; Elder R; Leeks KJ;
    Am J Prev Med; 2010 Jan; 38(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 20117566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interventions to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers systematic reviews of provider assessment and feedback and provider incentives.
    Sabatino SA; Habarta N; Baron RC; Coates RJ; Rimer BK; Kerner J; Coughlin SS; Kalra GP; Chattopadhyay S;
    Am J Prev Med; 2008 Jul; 35(1 Suppl):S67-74. PubMed ID: 18541190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Client-directed interventions to increase community demand for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review.
    Baron RC; Rimer BK; Breslow RA; Coates RJ; Kerner J; Melillo S; Habarta N; Kalra GP; Chattopadhyay S; Wilson KM; Lee NC; Mullen PD; Coughlin SS; Briss PA;
    Am J Prev Med; 2008 Jul; 35(1 Suppl):S34-55. PubMed ID: 18541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Client-directed interventions to increase community access to breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening a systematic review.
    Baron RC; Rimer BK; Coates RJ; Kerner J; Kalra GP; Melillo S; Habarta N; Wilson KM; Chattopadhyay S; Leeks K;
    Am J Prev Med; 2008 Jul; 35(1 Suppl):S56-66. PubMed ID: 18541188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services.
    Sabatino SA; Lawrence B; Elder R; Mercer SL; Wilson KM; DeVinney B; Melillo S; Carvalho M; Taplin S; Bastani R; Rimer BK; Vernon SW; Melvin CL; Taylor V; Fernandez M; Glanz K;
    Am J Prev Med; 2012 Jul; 43(1):97-118. PubMed ID: 22704754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cancer screening of older women : a primary care issue.
    Blair KA
    Cancer Pract; 1998; 6(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 9767334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contextual factors associated with uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening: A systematic review of the literature.
    Plourde N; Brown HK; Vigod S; Cobigo V
    Women Health; 2016; 56(8):906-25. PubMed ID: 26812962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.
    Camilloni L; Ferroni E; Cendales BJ; Pezzarossi A; Furnari G; Borgia P; Guasticchi G; Giorgi Rossi P;
    BMC Public Health; 2013 May; 13():464. PubMed ID: 23663511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Translation of an efficacious cancer-screening intervention to women enrolled in a Medicaid managed care organization.
    Dietrich AJ; Tobin JN; Cassells A; Robinson CM; Reh M; Romero KA; Flood AB; Beach ML
    Ann Fam Med; 2007; 5(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 17664498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Updated recommendations for client- and provider-oriented interventions to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.
    Community Preventive Services Task Force
    Am J Prev Med; 2012 Jul; 43(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 22704753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient and provider characteristics associated with colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening among Asian Americans.
    Thompson CA; Gomez SL; Chan A; Chan JK; McClellan SR; Chung S; Olson C; Nimbal V; Palaniappan LP
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Nov; 23(11):2208-17. PubMed ID: 25368396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care.
    Zapka J; Taplin SH; Price RA; Cranos C; Yabroff R
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2010; 2010(40):58-71. PubMed ID: 20386054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in Screening Abnormality Rates and Follow-Up of Breast, Cervical and Colorectal Cancer Screening within the PROSPR Consortium.
    Tosteson AN; Beaber EF; Tiro J; Kim J; McCarthy AM; Quinn VP; Doria-Rose VP; Wheeler CM; Barlow WE; Bronson M; Garcia M; Corley DA; Haas JS; Halm EA; Kamineni A; Rutter CM; Tosteson TD; Trentham-Dietz A; Weaver DL;
    J Gen Intern Med; 2016 Apr; 31(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 26658934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of provider and patient reminders, deployment of nurse practitioners, and financial incentives on cervical and breast cancer screening rates.
    Kaczorowski J; Hearps SJ; Lohfeld L; Goeree R; Donald F; Burgess K; Sebaldt RJ
    Can Fam Physician; 2013 Jun; 59(6):e282-9. PubMed ID: 23766067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effective interventions to facilitate the uptake of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: an implementation guideline.
    Brouwers MC; De Vito C; Bahirathan L; Carol A; Carroll JC; Cotterchio M; Dobbins M; Lent B; Levitt C; Lewis N; McGregor SE; Paszat L; Rand C; Wathen N
    Implement Sci; 2011 Sep; 6():112. PubMed ID: 21958602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving breast and colon cancer screening rates: a comparison of letters, automated phone calls, or both.
    Phillips L; Hendren S; Humiston S; Winters P; Fiscella K
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2015; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 25567822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening interventions in older women.
    Bowie JV; Curbow BA; Garza MA; Dreyling EK; Benz Scott LA; McDonnell KA
    Cancer Control; 2005 Nov; 12 Suppl 2():58-69. PubMed ID: 16327752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increasing breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening among rural women: Baseline characteristics of a randomized control trial.
    Biederman E; Baltic R; Katz ML; Rawl S; Vachon E; Monahan PO; Stump TE; Kettler C; Carter L; Young G; Xu W; Paskett ED; Champion V
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2022 Dec; 123():106986. PubMed ID: 36328234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic review of special events to promote breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in the United States.
    Escoffery C; Rodgers KC; Kegler MC; Haardörfer R; Howard DH; Liang S; Pinsker E; Roland KB; Allen JD; Ory MG; Bastani R; Fernandez ME; Risendal BC; Byrd TL; Coronado GD
    BMC Public Health; 2014 Mar; 14():274. PubMed ID: 24661503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Awareness and uptake of colorectal, breast, cervical and prostate cancer screening tests in Spain.
    Carrasco-Garrido P; Hernandez-Barrera V; Lopez de Andres A; Jimenez-Trujillo I; Gallardo Pino C; Jimenez-Garcıa R
    Eur J Public Health; 2014 Apr; 24(2):264-70. PubMed ID: 23813710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.