These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20117759)
1. Perceptions of morality and competence in (non)interdependent games. Krueger JI; DiDonato TE Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 20117759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptions of self and other in the prisoner's dilemma: outcome bias and evidential reasoning. Krueger JI; Acevedo M Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(4):593-618. PubMed ID: 18277518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Game relativity: how context influences strategic decision making. Vlaev I; Chater N J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):131-49. PubMed ID: 16478346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The name of the game: predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner's dilemma game moves. Liberman V; Samuels SM; Ross L Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Sep; 30(9):1175-85. PubMed ID: 15359020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making. van 't Wout M; Sanfey AG Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):796-803. PubMed ID: 18721917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What is moral about guilt? Acting "prosocially" at the disadvantage of others. de Hooge IE; Nelissen RM; Breugelmans SM; Zeelenberg M J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Mar; 100(3):462-73. PubMed ID: 21244173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new consequence of Simpson's paradox: stable cooperation in one-shot prisoner's dilemma from populations of individualistic learners. Chater N; Vlaev I; Grinberg M J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):403-21. PubMed ID: 18729707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Friend or foe: subjective expected relative similarity as a determinant of cooperation. Fischer I J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Aug; 138(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 19653794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolutionary escape from the prisoner's dilemma. Worden L; Levin SA J Theor Biol; 2007 Apr; 245(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 17169377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bridging the gap between moral reasoning and adolescent engagement in risky behavior. Kuther TL; Higgins-D'Alessandro A J Adolesc; 2000 Aug; 23(4):409-22. PubMed ID: 10936014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coordination success and interpersonal perceptions: matching versus mismatching. Abele S; Stasser G J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Sep; 95(3):576-92. PubMed ID: 18729695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Affective response to one's own moral violations. Berthoz S; Grèzes J; Armony JL; Passingham RE; Dolan RJ Neuroimage; 2006 Jun; 31(2):945-50. PubMed ID: 16490367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of outcome- and process-based social preferences and beliefs in Dictator Games and sequential Prisoner's Dilemmas. Aksoy O; Weesie J Soc Sci Res; 2014 May; 45():98-116. PubMed ID: 24576630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variation in behaviour promotes cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma game. McNamara JM; Barta Z; Houston AI Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6984):745-8. PubMed ID: 15085131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spreading of intolerance under economic stress: results from a reputation-based model. Martinez-Vaquero LA; Cuesta JA Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2014 Aug; 90(2):022805. PubMed ID: 25215779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficacy = endowment x efficiency: revisiting efficacy and endowment effects in a public goods dilemma. Yu CC; Au WT; Chan KS J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):155-69. PubMed ID: 19210072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Overcoming the self-promotion dilemma: interpersonal attraction and extra help as a consequence of who sings one's praises. Pfeffer J; Fong CT; Cialdini RB; Portnoy RR Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1362-74. PubMed ID: 16963607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are prosocials unique in their egalitarianism? The pursuit of equality in outcomes among individualists. Van den Bergh B; Dewitte S; De Cremer D Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Sep; 32(9):1219-31. PubMed ID: 16902241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mind games: the mental representation of conflict. Halevy N; Chou EY; Murnighan JK J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):132-48. PubMed ID: 21910551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]