200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20119881)
1. Enclosure shape influences cue competition effects and goal location learning.
Wilson PN; Alexander T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1552-67. PubMed ID: 20119881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Blocking of spatial learning between enclosure geometry and a local landmark.
Wilson PN; Alexander T
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 18980401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blocking of goal-location learning based on shape.
Alexander T; Wilson SP; Wilson PN
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):694-708. PubMed ID: 19379044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: generality across spatial configurations.
Sturz BR; Kelly DM; Brown MF
Anim Cogn; 2010 Mar; 13(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 19777275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiple landmarks, the encoding of environmental geometry and the spatial logics of a dual brain.
Chiesa AD; Pecchia T; Tommasi L; Vallortigara G
Anim Cogn; 2006 Oct; 9(4):281-93. PubMed ID: 16941155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learned predictiveness training modulates biases towards using boundary or landmark cues during navigation.
Buckley MG; Smith AD; Haselgrove M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1183-202. PubMed ID: 25409751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating cue competition in contextual cuing of visual search.
Beesley T; Shanks DR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):709-25. PubMed ID: 21895393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Overshadowing between landmarks on the touchscreen and in arena with pigeons.
Leising KJ; Garlick D; Blaisdell AP
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):488-94. PubMed ID: 21604908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gender differences in landmark learning for virtual navigation: the role of distance to a goal.
Chamizo VD; Artigas AA; Sansa J; Banterla F
Behav Processes; 2011 Sep; 88(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 21736927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling the effects of enclosure size on geometry learning.
Miller N
Behav Processes; 2009 Mar; 80(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 20522319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating the role of response in spatial context learning.
Makovski T; Jiang YV
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1563-79. PubMed ID: 21480078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments.
Kelly JW; Avraamides MN; Loomis JM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1092-107. PubMed ID: 17983315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The hide-and-seek of retrospective revaluation: recovery from blocking is context dependent in human causal learning.
Boddez Y; Baeyens F; Hermans D; Beckers T
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 21319914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of cue types on sex differences in human spatial memory.
Chai XJ; Jacobs LF
Behav Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 208(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 19963014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Blocking and overshadowing in human geometry learning.
Prados J
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 20853982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatial reorientation: the effects of space size on the encoding of landmark and geometry information.
Chiandetti C; Regolin L; Sovrano VA; Vallortigara G
Anim Cogn; 2007 Apr; 10(2):159-68. PubMed ID: 17136416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Defining a boundary in goal localization: Infinite number of points or extended surfaces.
Mou W; Zhou R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1115-27. PubMed ID: 23088544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial choices of macaque monkeys based on the visual representation of the response space: rotation of the stimuli.
Nedvidek J; Nekovarova T; Bures J
Behav Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 193(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 18588916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implicit learning of sequential regularities and spatial contexts in corticobasal syndrome.
Negash S; Boeve BF; Geda YE; Smith GE; Knopman DS; Ivnik RJ; Howard DV; Howard JH; Petersen RC
Neurocase; 2007 Jun; 13(3):133-43. PubMed ID: 17786771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
